xmcamail.2007_07: Re: [xmca] Techno logy

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

From: peter jones <h2cmng who-is-at yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sun Jul 22 2007 - 16:45:01 PDT

Hi all I wonder if I could please put two queries your way...? There are of course several definitions of 'technology', but focusing on the 'logy' study of definition - compared with other 'ologies' technology seems unique? Is this due to the art-sciences co-dependency, technologies ubiquity....? We don't seem to speak of other 'logies' (biology, geology, histology....) as we do technology? This biology is playing up (which may well be the case)! Geology never lasts long! Is anyone aware of any specific papers considering this? Or am I tricking myself...? Secondly, are there any key papers on 'unlearning' vs 'learning'. Within and without the addiction literature. Many thanks in advance for your thoughts... Peter Jones http://hodges-model.blogspot.com/ Hodges' Health Career - Care Domains - Model http://www.p-jones.demon.co.uk/ h2cm: help2Cmore - help-2-listen - help-2-care ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for your free account today http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Sun Jul 22 16:53 PDT 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 08 2007 - 06:02:19 PDT

Re: [xmca] Techno logy - word use compared with other 'logies'