These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Hi Kevin,
these were exactly the kind of questions I was doing myself when I
opened the thread. Thanks for putting them so nicely. I could not
express them as well as you did. And, as you, I don´t have an easy
answer.
David
On Sep 25, 2007, at 12:28 PM, Kevin Rocap wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> I'm not quite sure if I'm amplifying Eric's query below or
> diverging from it. Sorry to be unclear. ;-)
>
> I've been thinking about this myself. As a "host" are you obliged
> to be "gracious" such that pointing out things you find atrocious
> in your "guest", even though you're willing to give him/her the
> floor, completely undermines your role as "host"? Is this the
> question? Sorry to make it sound so abstract under the circumstances.
>
> If I heard correctly, Bollinger alluded in his speech that the
> invitation to come to Columbia was not unqualified. I believe he
> suggested that Ahmadinejad was told and understood that he'd have a
> say, but that it was unlikely to be an hospitable environment. If
> that's the case (and even if that wasn't that explicit, I would
> think someone as smart as Ahmadinejad would understand this), then
> Ahmadinejad bears as much responsibility for his decision to put
> himself in that position, no? It would be a bit disingenuous I
> think for him to believe he was blind-sided, no?
>
> If I'm understanding Eric's comment then I also wonder why should
> hard statements and difficult questions be off-limits? Does the
> role of "host" in an academic exchange require an abdication of
> conscience and a tacit agreement to not call out an interlocutor,
> even if you intend to give him/her the floor for his/her own
> statements and rebuttals? What are the premises of academic life
> and free speech that you have in mind, David, that would preclude
> this?
>
> These are genuine, not rhetorical questions, as I am still fuzzy on
> the answers myself. Personally I felt it was a mixed bag. I
> liked most of Bollinger's hard hitting statements and thought just
> a couple were over the top in that they did not add substance, per
> se, and, as has been noted, could easily be perceived as
> victimizing Ahmadinejad, which I'd imagine would run counter to
> sentiments Bollinger himself would care to stir. But the notion
> of giving a hard-hitting and critical introduction is not something
> I believe is de facto inappropriate in an academic setting. Thoughts?
>
> In Peace,
> K.
>
>
>
> ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org wrote:
>> David:
>>
>> Providing a stage for a polarizing figure such as Ahmadinejad is
>> exactly
>> how colleges have faired over the years. How does this preclude
>> not asking
>> difficult questions?
>>
>> eric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> David
>> Preiss
>>
>> <davidpreiss@uc. To: Activity Mind Culture eXtended
>> <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
>> cl>
>> cc:
>> Sent by: Subject:
>> [xmca] Columbia
>> events
>> xmca-
>> bounces@web
>>
>> er.ucsd.edu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 09/24/2007
>> 09:36
>>
>> PM
>> Please
>> respond
>> to
>> "eXtended
>> Mind,
>> Culture,
>> Activity"
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear XMCArs,
>>
>> I followed from Chile the strange sequence of events at Columbia at
>> the international press. I was wondering if somebody wants to comment
>> the issues raised by the occasion. At least, for me, it is hard to
>> understand the final move made by L. Bollinger: to invite the iranian
>> president, and then to attack him verbally. What was that? If he
>> really thinks what he says, he should have not invited him, first
>> place. But if he made that, to excoriate the guy his institution was
>> inviting as a result of context pressure, then he is acting
>> hypocritically and using the hate the iranian president raises to
>> gain publicity. Too contradictory for me and anything but the way
>> academic life and free speech should be handled, in my opinion.
>>
>>
>> David Preiss, Ph.D.
>> Subdirector de Extensión y Comunicaciones
>> Escuela de Psicología
>> Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
>> Av Vicuña Mackenna 4860
>> Macul, Santiago
>> Chile
>>
>> Fono: 3544605
>> Fax: 3544844
>> e-mail: davidpreiss@uc.cl
>> web personal: http://web.mac.com/ddpreiss/
>> web institucional: http://www.epuc.cl
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
David Preiss, Ph.D.
Subdirector de Extensión y Comunicaciones
Escuela de Psicología
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Av Vicuña Mackenna 4860
Macul, Santiago
Chile
Fono: 3544605
Fax: 3544844
e-mail: davidpreiss@uc.cl
web personal: http://web.mac.com/ddpreiss/
web institucional: http://www.epuc.cl
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Tue Sep 25 11:33 PDT 2007