These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[xmca] Narration as BIG story in contrast to little story



David Ke

I thought I would bring to your attention an article in the current journal
of Theory & Psychology by Michael Bamberg titled "Who am I? Narration and
its Contributions to Self and Identity".  He is contrasting the biographical
approach [lives as texts] as a metaphor of BIG stories with the Narrative
Practice approach as a metaphor of small stories.

To prime the upcoming discussion on identity formation that this months
article will explore I want to bring Bamberg's perspective on distinguishing
self from identity. On page 6 of the article he writes,

"in broad strokes, identity is a label attributed to the attempt to
differentiate and integrate a sense of self along different social and
personal dimensions" [which the article explains not not distinct or
separate dimensions] "Consequently, identities can be differentiated and
claimed according to varying socio-cultural categories e.g., gender, age,
race, occupation, gangs, socio-economic status, ethnicity, class, nation
states, or regional territory. Any claim of identity faces three dilemmas:
1) sameness of a sense of self across time in the face of constant change;
2) uniqueness of the person vis-a-vis others in the face of being the same
as everybody else; and 3) the construction of agency as constituted by self
(with a self-to-world direction of fit) and world (with a world -to- self
direction of fit). It is argued that IDENTITY takes off from the
continuity/change dilemma, and from here ventures into issues of uniqueness
(self-other differentiation) and agency.  In contrast, notions of SELF and
SENSE OF SELF start from the self/other and agency differentiation and from
here can filter into the diachronicity of continuity and change".

David,  Bamberg is elaborating a notion of a small story approach which is
in the discourse tradition of the Narrative Practice framework. {Hutto is
also working in this realm}  Not sure how these ideas will possibly link up
with notions of identity in the coming article to be posted but I
appreciated how Bamberg opens his article with 3 dilemmas to be answered by
concepts of identity and a sense of self.

Larry
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca