These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Fascinating!! I see the two as slight reframings of each other. In the original I sent out there is nothing at all I can see about being aware that one is re-inventing. I was sure not aware I was re-inventing (a bastardized) version of Ilyenkov until Bakhurst told me about it. Does this mean I have to switch quotation?? Now if only we could figure out "the trick" life would be even better than the best of all possible worlds. :-) mike On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Martin Packer <packer@duq.edu> wrote: > I already thought of this! ;) > > On Mar 20, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Peter Smagorinsky wrote: > > > Where I see the difference is that in Mike's original post, new ideas are > derivative of old. In the one I found, all ideas have already been thought > of, but people think them anew, even if they're unaware of the prior > versions. > > __________________________________________ > _____ > xmca mailing list > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca > __________________________________________ _____ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca