These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] fetishism | word meaning



The poem is neat and your explication brings to mind a recurrent thought
when I encounter the core idea of "the thought is completed in the word." I
(think I) know what LSV and Mandelshtam are saying, but I always have this
thought that the thought is not yet completed, not in so far as it is taken
up, perhaps transformed, and comes back again at a later time, in some new,
albeit related, form, to begin that side of the cycle over again.
mike

On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Tony Whitson <twhitson@udel.edu> wrote:

> I clipped the wrong line from Martin's post in that last message. I meant
> the Dickinson verse in reponse to the line that now appears below from
> Martin.
>
> In Dickinson's verse, what's not timeless is not merely the meaning that a
> word does as a lexical unit in a language (i.e., in the philological sense),
> but even in a specific utterance the word spoken continues meaning, as it
> continues living, non-timelessly.
>
>
> On Sun, 1 May 2011, Tony Whitson wrote:
>
>  On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Martin Packer wrote:
>>
>
>  For LSV word-meaning is not timeless. It changes over time; he didn't
>>
> study philology for nothing!
>
>
>  A word is dead
>>     When it is said
>>   Some say.
>> I say it just
>> Begins to live
>>  That day.
>>
>>      --Emily Dickinson
>>
>> I find it helpful to think of meaning as something that words do -- not
>> something they contain, convey, etc.
>>
>>
> Tony Whitson
> UD School of Education
> NEWARK  DE  19716
>
> twhitson@udel.edu
> _______________________________
>
> "those who fail to reread
>  are obliged to read the same story everywhere"
>                  -- Roland Barthes, S/Z (1970)
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca