These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] Units of Scientiic Achievement



On 20 June 2011 15:33, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote:

> But the metaphor Michael is calling on, Carol, as I see it is "normal
> science" is the incremental, gradual adaptation of a species to its niche,
> and remaining much the same for millions of years, and on the other hand,
> when a species is under real pressure, you get exactly the process Kuhn
> describes in science: rapid diversification and die-outs, with a distinctly
> new species species emerging at the end. It's called "punctuated evolutuion"
> isn't it?
>
> I find the idea of a formation perfecting itself into extinction
> attractive.
>

Said like a representative!  :)

Though maybe that's part of their attraction:

http://images.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&safe=off&gbv=2&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=6mACTubxN87F8QPQzuzNDQ&ved=0CDcQBSgA&q=sea+dragon+horse&spell=1&biw=1109&bih=671

Huw
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca