These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] Re: ye

Tony, I tend to read Gadamer with an already-fused concept of discourse/activity, but so far as I can see his notion of "horizon" and "situation" is different than what is entailed in the distinction between Discourse and Activity, that is, Discourse abstracted from the "long-duration Activity" or Project of which it is a part, and Activity abstracted from the language-games through which it is enacted and constituted. I think we are speaking of two fusions. Am I right in thinking that "horizon" is linked to "situation" in Gadamer? If so, we also have different concepts of Situation and Horizon, even though his concepts are very useful and well-worth assimilating. :)

Andy

Tony Whitson wrote:
Well said, Andy; but for this, instead of "assimilation," this might be a perfect occasion for invoking Gadamer's idea of a "fusion of horizons."

On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Andy Blunden wrote:

Yes, that's exactly it, Monica. I didn't realise you weren't a native speaker.

Just a warning/qualification on what I have said. I am not claiming that the concepts of Activity and Discourse ought to be identified; clearly they indicate different traditions of scientific analysis which pick out different objects from the flow of human life. I think I am suggesting though that both sciences ought to expand their self-concept so as to assimilate the gains of the other, creating a single, nuanced concept of Discursive Activity. This of course has nothing to do with assimilating practical actions with word meaning. But the distinction between practical intelligence and verbal thinking/action is developmentally overcome, ontologically, but also historically, I think.

Andy



--
*Andy Blunden*
Joint Editor MCA: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=g932564744
Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/
Book: http://www.brill.nl/default.aspx?partid=227&pid=34857
MIA: http://www.marxists.org
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca