These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Andy, you wrote:
"I stick to my position, that "institutions" should be regarded as
projects, not tools or material artefacts of any kind (though artefacts
are needed in the realisation of an institution, such as signage,
legislation, all kinds of documents, buildings, uniforms, etc., etc)."
Projects...... an intriguing, to me, idea - institutions as projects - particularly considering the root of the word - and its cousins, like "projectile", etc.
many thanks for this thought.
p
Phillip White, PhD
University of Colorado Denver
School of Education
phillip.white@ucdenver.edu