These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[xmca] writing, continued



The oral/written language differentiation is sufficiently central to CHAT
ideas that I thought there might be
more discussion.

As I (imperfectly) recall, Greg raised the issue with respect to his own
writing. David reminded us that
*Tool and Sign* and of course *Speech and Thought* have a lot to say.

Anyway, the question of now different instruments of writing afford
different dynamics of thought is a live topic
of convesation as a PRACTICAL matter at lchc, never mind being
theoretically interesting,

So, those those interested, here is another article in that topic area.
mike

http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/short/phenom.html
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca