These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Hi Andy et al - Martin's book, the science of qualitative research has a chapter that traces Kant-Husserl- Schutz - BergerLuckman that we r reading at Lchc. It helped me a lot to sort out this branch of thought. It is followed by a chapter that traces Heidegger - Merleau Ponty- garfinkle. I have heard there is an electronic version, but do not know how to get it. Working from actual hard copy! Mike On Apr 28, 2012, at 10:19 AM, Andrew Babson <ababson@umich.edu> wrote: > He was very influential to Garfinkel, and so from an intellectual > historical perspective, the development of ethnomethodology, > conversation analysis and modern sociolinguistics. > > On 4/28/12, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote: >> I'd just like to share the attached article, written in 1945 by Alfred >> Schuetz, a refugee from the Frankfurt School living in New York, like so >> many others. In the article he appropriates Wm James, GH Mead and J >> Dewey, whilst coming from the Pheneomenology of Husserl, to adapt the >> concepts of Pheneomenology to social theory. It is quite interesting. He >> remains, in my view within the orbit of Phenomenology, but readers will >> recognise significant points of agreement with AN Leontyev's Activity >> Theory. What he calls "Conduct" comes close to "Activity," and he >> introduces the concept of Action which is certainly the same as it is >> for CHAT, and instead of "an activity" (the 3rd level in ANL's system) >> he has "Project." But although this project has the same relation to >> Action, it is a subjectively derived project posited on the world, >> rather than project discovered in the world, and having a basically >> societal origin. This is the point at which I think he confines himself >> to Phenomenology, and fails to reach a real social theory. The whole >> business about "multiple realities" which gives the article its title is >> very tedious, but actually is valid in its basics I think. >> Some of us on this list may appreciate him. He's a recent discovery for me. >> Andy >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *Andy Blunden* >> Joint Editor MCA: http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/hmca20/18/1 >> Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/ >> Book: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1608461459/ >> > __________________________________________ > _____ > xmca mailing list > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca __________________________________________ _____ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca