These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Mark-- Perhaps the attached will be helpful as you navigate the issues of teaching/learning/obuchenie. Thanks for your papers, Bella! mike On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Bella Kotik-Friedgut <bella.kotik@gmail.com > wrote: > To Mark > Here are short clarifications > Scaffolding can be defined as a way of promoting learning within ZPD using > system of means: mediators, language, shared (teacher or other > person-student) activity. > Dynamic assessment (DA) can be defined as process A- teaching =obuchenie > (using scaffolding) -A. > Attached are my papers on promoting autonomy for new (foreign or second) > language learners and on affective factors in SLL. > Bella Kotik-Friedgut > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Mark de Boer <mark.yomogi@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I've been doing a lot of reading on interaction in a tool-mediated > learning > > environment and have begun to read specifically on different forms of > > assessment. In the second language acquisition classroom, I've been > > examining scaffolding, formative and summative assessment as well as > > dynamic assessment. > > > > These forms of assessment are very much different, but there is > literature > > which suggests that scaffolding is similar in many ways to dynamic > > assessment. I'm not in agreement with this, but I'm attempting to figure > a > > way to decipher the differences not theoretically, but in the classroom > > (there are enough convincing arguments in the literature to help me > > differentiate between scaffolding and dynamic assessment). > > > > Putting that aside for the moment, I've encountered the word obuchenie > > before through this list and also in some of the literature, and I'm not > > sure how to define obuchenie with respect with dynamic assessment. I'm > > convinced that they are one in the same. > > > > Looking for some guidance. > > > > Best, > > > > Mark > > __________________________________________ > > _____ > > xmca mailing list > > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca > > > > > > -- > Sincerely yours Bella Kotik-Friedgut > > __________________________________________ > _____ > xmca mailing list > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca > >
Attachment:
perilsoftranslation.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
__________________________________________ _____ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca