These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Bruce Yes, read this! Absolutely 'fraudulent' - and should we believe its better anywhere else in academia, where competition is so rife ... is our field any better? I hope we can believe that most posts to this list are made without competition and reputation in mind. Can we in xmca declare ourselves an 'academic free zone' from ths point of view.. and if so, how? Thanks for raising this. Julian ________________________________________ From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] on behalf of Bruce Robinson [bruce@brucerob.eu] Sent: 14 September 2012 22:44 To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity Subject: [xmca] Positivism, plagiarism and psychology A big feature in today's Guardian on trends in academic fraud and its detection with particular reference to psychology. Bruce R http://m.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/sep/13/scientific-research-fraud-bad-practice?cat=science&type=article -- Sent from Kaiten Mail. Please excuse my brevity. __________________________________________ _____ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca__________________________________________ _____ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca