These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Not OK just yet. I'd like to try to do some dissolving of your parsing
of "lytic" a bit.
I thought you said you were parsing (lysing?) "lytic" as "gradual"?
"Gradual" seems very different from "loosening" or "dissolving", no?
The process may be gradual, but to say that "lytical" means "gradual"
is like saying that "boiling" means "gradual" (after all it takes time
for water to boil - esp. if you are watching it).
It seems like there is something very important in the rest of the
word "lytic" and how that relates to development. It seems that part
of what is being described here is the sense in which developments can
actually involve the breaking down (lysing!) of previous psychological
"structures" or "formations". That seems much more interesting than
"gradual". And it also seems a wonderful corrective to the commonly
assumed model of development as simple linear progression.
For example, there is a classic example of language learning where
very young kids will say conjugate verbs correctly b.c. they are
memorized, but then when they start to learn the rules of conjugation,
they will no longer produce them correctly (b.c. some don't fit the
patterns that they are learning - e.g., past tense of "run" is not
"runned"). So their memorized understanding of "ran" must be "lysed"!
The result is that from the dissolving of those meanings a new meaning
can emerge - e.g., add "ed" to the present tense of a verb to make it
past tense.
What do you think?
I'd be interested in opening this conversation to XMCA if you are
interested. Many folks smarter than I when it comes to translation and
such.
-greg
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net
<mailto:ablunden@mira.net>> wrote:
check the definitions for the suffix "-lytical." They mean
"loosening or dissolving." OK?
andy
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Andy Blunden*
Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/ <http://home.mira.net/%7Eandy/>
Book: http://www.brill.nl/concepts
--
Gregory A. Thompson, Ph.D.
883 Spencer W. Kimball Tower
Department of Anthropology
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
http://byu.academia.edu/GregoryThompson