These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

Re: other voices

From: Eugene Matusov (ematusov@udel.edu)
Date: Sat Mar 31 2001 - 06:04:08 PST


Hi Shelley and everybody--
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Shelley Wong [mailto:Wong.180@osu.edu]
  Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 4:59 PM
  To: ch-sig@yahoogroups.com; ch-sig@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [ch-sig] Re: other voices

  I like the way this dialogue on "other voices" versus "grand narrative"
"sociocultural" versus "sociohistorical" has developed. I prefer
"socio-historical" to "socio-cultural" with respect to the academy because
we need to look who historically has been part of the academy and who has
been excluded

  --I will not be able to be in Seattle this year but hope to join next year
in New Orleans. From an immigrants/foreigners/TESOL/bilingual education
point of view I would pose "what does sociocultural" versus
"socioHistorical" offer TESOL/BE teachers and students re voice and agency?
Historical offers a more political and sociology of education --knowledge
for whom--(history of exclusion--how to expand opportunities for minority
recruitment--those many voices who have been excluded from the academy.)

  Good question. In my view, from the way how you asked the question, you
raise it within a sociocultural (with "critical-historical flavor" nicely
defined recently by Diane) rather than cultural-historical (aka Vygotsky)
tradition. I'm not a specialist in TESOL/BE (I'm just one of practicing BL
in US :-) but let me try to rephrase your question to fit the
cultural-historical approach. It will sound something like that, "What are
historically most progressive/advanced mediational BE tools for students to
become self-regulated in using a second language?" This inquiry will lead
probably to a historical analysis of mediational BE tools starting from most
primitive/everyday/traditional to most advanced which probably will be
defined as schooled/scientific. At the end of this analysis, perhaps an
innovative school-based BE program will be proposed.

  I hope I'm not caricaturing the cultural-historical approach too much. As
one of my good Ukrainian colleague remarked after reading this discussion,
"Eugene, you have become completely Americanized." So watch me! :-)

  What do you think?

  Eugene

  Shelley Wong
  Ohio State University

  At 06:10 PM 3/29/01 -0000, lclynch@indiana.edu wrote:
>The ONE GRAND theory approach and promoting dialogue approach is an
>interesting distinction. I never saw it that way, but makes sense.
>There obviously is not a right or wrong approach between the two, but
>I'd like to see then between the two approaches what do we agree on?
>Where do we diverge? Are the historical and cultural aspects of the
>Vygotskian school in a linear relationship on a scale? Do we see
>varying degrees of history orientedness or culture orientedness in
>recent sociocultural research, and if so what does that mean?
>
>I do appreciate the American Vygotskian school's effort in
>identifying relationships among cultures, and that has been the focus
>of my research for the last couple of years. However, there are times
>that I do question myself "what more are we doing than describing a
>cultural phenomenon using academic vocabulary?" If we can't answer
>that, then I think that we will be estranging ourselves even further
>from the non-academic world. Which is ironic, because the nature of
>sociocultural research is to divulge in research of everyday activity
>in the natural setting....
>
>Lisa Y-L
>
>--- In ch-sig who-is-at y..., "Eugene Matusov" <ematusov@u...> wrote:
>> Hi Mike and Lisa--
>>
>> In my view, one of major issues separating Russian Vygotskian
>school and US
>> Vygotskian school is the issue of diversity. Russian Vygtoskian
>school (or
>> better to say a family of approaches) exemplified nicely by
>Davydov's
>> statement about one right way for cognitive development believes
>that there
>> is one truth, one historical development of society, one direction
>of
>> progress, one Grand Theory of development (in the Hegel-Marx-
>Vygotsky
>> tradition). Russian Vygotskian school focuses on defining and
>promoting THE
>> progress.
>>
>> US Vygotskian school (or better to say a family of approaches)
>rejects the
>> Hegel-Marx-Vygotsky idea of one historical development of society
>and focus,
>> instead, on relations among cultures. US Vygotskian school focuses
>on
>> promoting dialogue (cf. Bakhtin), participation, and access to
>practices and
>> institutions. That is why, in my view, Jim Wetrsch insists on the
>term
>> "sociocultural" rather than "socio-historical" as Vygotsky used.
>Russian
>> Vygotskian school is much closer to Vygotsky, of course (remember
>> Luria-Vygotsky x-cultural studies of "primitive" Uzbeks?).
>>
>> I wonder how can US sociocultrual approach guide us to promote
>necessary
>> transformations of the academia insitutionsto make it open and more
>> comfotable for participation of "others" (not middle- and upper-
>class white
>> males)?
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Eugene
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: <lclynch who-is-at i...>
>> To: <ch-sig who-is-at y...>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 8:48 AM
>> Subject: [ch-sig] Re: other voices
>>
>>
>> > This sounds very interesting. It is my understanding that one of
>> > Vygotsky's original intention was to develop a unified
>psychology. I
>> > am unsure if the post-Vygotskian Russian and Western scholars
>> > undertook this task after him, or by developing their theoretical
>> > framework further isolated themsevles from the other schools of
>> > psychology. Additionally, it would be interesting to identify how
>we
>> > related to our allies. I think that this type of effort may
>> > clarify/simplify the stereotypical complexity that is associated
>to
>> > sociocultural/sociohistorical psychology.
>> >
>> > -------------------------------------------------
>> > Lisa C. Yamagata-Lynch
>> > Doctoral Candidate in Educational Psychology and
>> > Instructional Systems Technology
>> > Indiana University, Bloomington
>> > lclynch who-is-at i...
>> > http://php.indiana.edu/~lclynch
>> > -------------------------------------------------
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Mike Cole" <mcole who-is-at w...>
>> To: <ematusov who-is-at U...>
>> Cc: <ch-sig who-is-at y...>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 12:03 AM
>> Subject: RE: other voices
>>
>>
>> > Hi Eugene-- We seem to be on the same wavelength. And there is a
>really
>> > interesting paradox/puzzle here. In the US, we can, as you point
>out,
>> > really push for other voices, with diversity designated along a
>lot of
>> > dimensions: class, gender, ethnicity, etc.
>> >
>> > but what about the parallel traditions in the form Soviet Union?
>We hear
>> > a little from a few Georgians, a few Armenians, a few Estonians,
>but
>> > Vasilii Davydov scandalized LCHC by his insistence on the one
>right way
>> > to cognitive development and we hear little from the many many
>ethnicities
>> > of Russia and Eastern Europe.
>> >
>> > right now I am hoping to be able to cooperate with Finnish
>colleagues who
>> > have an natural historical interest in interactions with the
>people of
>> Karelia.
>> >
>> > What about the volga germans? The Jews stranded in the paradise of
>> Beribezhan?
>> > etc?
>> >
>> > It could make for a fascinating meeting.
>> > mike
>> > ,.
>> --------------------
>> >
>> > --- In ch-sig who-is-at y..., "Eugene Matusov" <ematusov@u...> wrote:
>> > > Thanks, Mike, for the interesting suggestion. Maybe it is a good
>> > idea to
>> > > think whom we can invite.
>> > >
>> > > I also have a nostalgia for one of our first business meetings
>(in
>> > San
>> > > Francisco, I guess) when we had a debate on sociocultural/CHAT
>> > views on
>> > > education and its problems.
>> > >
>> > > Also, I was thinking that it will be nice to invite our allies
>like
>> > social
>> > > constructionists, Deweyians, feminists, and so on and have
>> > discussion
>> > > exploring similarities and differences among this family of
>> > approaches...
>> > >
>> > > Another topic that is dear to me is US academia for women,
>people
>> > of color,
>> > > immigrants, and foreigners (the groups are not mutually
>exclusive
>> > of course
>> > > :-). It is not a top military secret that US academia has been
>> > historically
>> > > designed to fit white middle- and upper-class males. Also, US
>> > economic and
>> > > political domination in the world makes US academia almost the
>> > academia. It
>> > > is interesting to explore how "others" feel, think, and live in
>> > that regime,
>> > > what problems "they" have and that "our" place in addressing the
>> > problems.
>> > >
>> > > Any other ideas? What do you think?
>> > >
>> > > Eugene
>> > >
>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > From: Mike Cole [mailto:mcole who-is-at w...]
>> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 12:28 PM
>> > > > To: xmca who-is-at w...
>> > > > Subject: other voices
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Eugene-- I will not be able to make it to Seattle, but
>hopefully
>> > will
>> > > > be able to make it to New Orleans next year. In any event, I
>> > think that
>> > > > an interesting theme would be something like "other voices."
>By
>> > this I
>> > > > mean, cultural-historical theorists who have contributed to
>the
>> > > > development
>> > > > of educational theory who have not figured prominently in
>most of
>> > the
>> > > > discussions I have seen.
>> > > >
>> > > > Bill B's note on Elkonin, who ought be better known than he is
>> > sparked
>> > > > this idea, but there are lots of younger people from Eastern
>> > Europe
>> > > > who might be involved and I would not restrict the list to
>> > the "eastern"
>> > > > tradition, but think about possibilities from other parts of
>the
>> > world
>> > > > as well.
>> > > > mike
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> > ch-sig-unsubscribe who-is-at y...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>> >
>> >
>
>
>------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
>Make good on the promise you made at graduation to keep
>in touch. Classmates.com has over 14 million registered
>high school alumni--chances are you'll find your friends!
>http://us.click.yahoo.com/03IJGA/DMUCAA/4ihDAA/1fSVlB/TM
>---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>ch-sig-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
  Ohio State University
  School of Teaching and Learning
  Foreign/Second Language Education
  333 Arps Hall
  1945 N. High St.
  Columbus, OH 43210
  (614) 292-8046



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 01 2001 - 01:01:27 PST