These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
In a message dated 5/1/2001 9:55:23 AM Central Daylight Time,
mowen@rem.bangor.ac.uk writes:
> What has made a difference form
> acting at time a to acting at time b is context, or recognition of context
> or the ability of change context/see beyond current contexts. Thus the
> presentation of technology changing the context in which thinking/learning
>
If this is referring to changing context from paper and pencil to keyboard
and screen, then I don't see much of a change in context. A change in
context has to do with providing a significant change in presentation of
syllogistic(sic) context. This would be in the Gardner's tradition of
multiple intelligences. Before I go on with this idea I would appreciate
more input from others.
Eric
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 01 2001 - 01:01:03 PDT