These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Dear Anton,
Several papers in the following volume may help.
Regards,
Phil
Hedegaard, M. and Lompscher, J. (1999) Learning Activity and
Development, Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
On 31/05/2007, at 4:30 AM, Anton Yasnitsky wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> we are presently starting a research on, roughly,
> voluntary behaviour development in preschoolers
> in Kindergarten settings. So, I wondering if
> anybody is aware of any research done on
> Kindergarten (child day care center) as an
> Activity system, from any research perspective. I
> believe there is a lot of literature on this out
> there, but this is a fairly new topic to me, so
> -- any help will be very much appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Anton.
>
> --- Paula Towsey <paulat@johnwtowsey.co.za>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Mike and Anton
>>
>> Although Vygotsky maintains that solving the
>> problem of the blocks isn't
>> dependent on 'previous experience or knowledge'
>> (T&L, 1986, pp.97-98), I
>> found that there are other elements of a
>> school-like nature that Vygotsky
>> apparently did not discuss in Chapter Five of
>> T&L. His introduction to this
>> (finely crafted and delicate) instrument starts
>> along these lines:
>>
>> "The functional method of double stimulation in
>> the study of concept
>> formation begins by introducing nonsense words
>> that from the beginning have
>> no meaning for the subject. According to
>> Vygotsky, the introduction of
>> nonsense words was adapted from Ach's (1921)
>> use of nonsense words in his
>> experimental procedures. These nonsense words
>> are artificial concepts that
>> actually mean a combination of characteristics,
>> of real attributes, but "for
>> which no ready concept and word exist" in the
>> given language (1986, p. 97).
>> This experimental method is designed to reveal
>> the processes involved in the
>> subject's coming to understand the nonsense
>> words and, at the same time, to
>> reveal the development of these concepts. The
>> procedure can be used with
>> adults and children because solving the problem
>> doesn't depend on or
>> presuppose prior experience or knowledge of the
>> words and concepts in the
>> experiment: the experiment doesn't use 'tall',
>> 'short', 'large' or 'small'
>> on their own, but combines these into new
>> relationships exemplified in the
>> words cev, bik, mur, and lag." (Towsey, 2007,
>> p.58)
>>
>> For your interest, I've attached my discussion
>> of the three-year-olds'
>> responses to the blocks - the 'hidden
>> curriculum' seemed to be preparing
>> these children well for a rote-style approach
>> to education!
>>
>> Paula
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
>> [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On
>> Behalf Of Anton Yasnitsky
>> Sent: 30 May 2007 08:18 AM
>> To: mcole@weber.ucsd.edu; eXtended Mind,
>> Culture, Activity
>> Subject: Re: [xmca] FW: The functional method
>> of double stimulation - and
>> somephotographs
>>
>> Just in case: we are meeting with our Ukrainian
>> team in a couple of days and are open to any
>> research initiative of this kind. A good
>> starting
>> point for a cross-cultural project, eh :)?
>>
>>
>> --- Mike Cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Might some kind of collective, distributed
>>> effort at conducting a small
>>> study using these materials
>>> be of interest to XMCA folks?
>>> mike
>>>
>>> On 5/29/07, Carol Macdonald
>>> <carolmacdon@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> P
>>>> Great to get this. I tried at the weekend
>> to
>>> see how you were, but you
>>>> were
>>>> out.
>>>>
>>>> I am about to contact Nicoleen for the 2nd
>>> time, and will let you know
>>>> directly I hear something.
>>>>
>>>> Jaki's results are back--with 16 pages of
>>> corrections. But at least they
>>>> are finally back from the second examiner.
>>>>
>>>> I am now drowning in work on four projects.
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday I am to have a two hour meeting
>>> with the Kellogg Foundation
>>>> about the bibliotherapy project proposal.
>>> Wish me luck.
>>>>
>>>> Rush, rush
>>>> Love
>>>> C
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 29/05/07, Paula Towsey
>>> <paulat@johnwtowsey.co.za> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Ana
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your suggestion that I
>>> forward this email to the
>>>> group. The
>>>>> blocks I used for my cross-sectional
>> study
>>> were made by Stoelting Co.
>>>>> (USA),
>>>>> according to the specs. provided by Jacob
>>> Kasanin and Eugenia Hanfmann
>>>>> (+/-1936/37).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My research exercise, 'In Search of
>>> Vygotsky's Blocks: exploring cev,
>>>> bik,
>>>>> mur, and lag in South Africa', was
>>> conducted for my M. Ed. (Psychology
>>>> in
>>>>> Education) by course work and research
>>> report at Wits University.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Paula Towsey
>>> [mailto:paulat@johnwtowsey.co.za]
>>>>> Sent: 28 May 2007 04:47 PM
>>>>> To: 'ana@zmajcenter.org'
>>>>> Subject: The functional method of double
>>> stimulation - and some
>>>>> photographs
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Ana
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To introduce myself: my name is Paula
>>> Towsey and I followed, with a
>>>> great
>>>>> deal of interest, some of your
>> conversation
>>> about the method of double
>>>>> stimulation - Vygotsky's Blocks - on the
>>> XMCA in March. I conducted
>>>>> research with this method last year but
>>> wasn't able to join in with your
>>>>> conversation because I wasn't on the XMCA
>>> mailing list in March. I am
>>>> now
>>>>> -
>>>>> but am writing to you separately because
>>> the topic is no longer current
>>>> on
>>>>> XMCA. I do hope that by writing to you
>>> directly I'm not breaking any
>>>> XMCA
>>>>> protocols!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In reading between the lines, Ana, it
>> seems
>>> to me that the pathway you
>>>>> followed with the method of approach with
>>> the blocks at the University
>>>> of
>>>>> Belgrade was more directly linked - for
>>> historical and geographical
>>>>> reasons,
>>>>> perhaps - in source to Sakharov's
>> approach.
>>> The sources I was most
>>>> easily
>>>>> able to find flowed mainly through
>> Hanfmann
>>> and Kasanin via Kozulin's
>>>>> translation of Thought and Language
>> (1986):
>>> suffice it to say here
>>>> (though
>>>>> I
>>>>> can send you more) that I noticed a
>>
> === message truncated ===>
> _______________________________________________
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>
>
>
>
> Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving
> junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://
> mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Wed May 30 16:53 PDT 2007