These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

Re: [xmca] Compatible

From: Carol Macdonald <carolmacdon who-is-at gmail.com>
Date: Wed Nov 07 2007 - 10:27:59 PST

A theory of mind is essentially interested in how soon young children
realise that other people have minds. Instrumentality is not part of *their
* theory, but Mike you are of course right, and we might say that getting
attention is the primary act of instrumentality and getting the adult (maybe
a willing sibling) to do something would be the secondary level/kind of
instrumentality.

It's such an interesting topic that maybe one of our lurkers would want to
do a study for a graduate study? How about that?

Carol

On 07/11/2007, Mike Cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Carol-- I found this comment interesting: "However, a theory of mind
> would
> not
> > get as far as instrumentality." What do you have in mind here? Isn't
> pointing to get the attention of another an instrumental act?
>
> Presumably, what Tomasello and a LOT of others seem to arguing is that
> there
> is a primal, ready at birth, inter-personal/social unity of self and other
> that serves as the grounding for all forms of further development.
> Development from this already and always there foundation involves forms
> of
> differentiation and incorporation/appropriation that are also mutually
> accomplished.
>
> A huge subject.
> mike
>
> On Nov 7, 2007 9:35 AM, Carol Macdonald <carolmacdon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 7, 2007 8:45 AM, Carol Macdonald <carolmacdon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Mike
> > > Yes, this is definitely compatible. However, a theory of mind would
> not
> > > get as far as instrumentality. The research is certainly very
> > interesting,
> > > but I think that it could go further by testing the instrumentality
> and
> > may
> > > give some kind of rating of the infant's pleasure. This may be for
> other
> > > people to try.
> > > Regards
> > > Carol
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Pax Te Cum"
> > > 6 Andover Road
> > > Westdene
> > > 2092 Johannesburg
> > > 011 673 9265 082 562 1050
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Pax Te Cum"
> > 6 Andover Road
> > Westdene
> > 2092 Johannesburg
> > 011 673 9265 082 562 1050
> > _______________________________________________
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>

-- 
"Pax Te Cum"
6 Andover Road
Westdene
2092 Johannesburg
011 673 9265  082 562 1050
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Wed Nov 7 10:31 PST 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 11 2007 - 10:18:41 PST