These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
I am not sure whether we ought to represent them separately, as they
are dialectically related, that is, two aspects of the same coin that
one-sidedly ( :-) ) represent the whole thing. This is what I have
been suggesting for a while, not that we need to represent them
separately, but that we need to look at Yrjö's structure and think it
in terms of representing the dialectical co-presence of the ideal and
material. Michael
On 17-Nov-07, at 3:33 PM, Mike Cole wrote:
As to having ideal and material triangles separately represented, I
have
not made it that far yet either. I do think that all cultural
artifacts are
both material and ideal, and it may well make sense to extend this
approach
to all elements of an activity system, I just have not gotten there
in my
thinking.
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Sat Nov 17 16:08 PST 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 11 2007 - 10:18:41 PST