These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
This article from the same issue may also be of interest:
Daniels, Harry. "Discourse and Identity in Cultural-Historical Activity
Theory: A Response." International Journal of Educational Research 46, no.
1-2 (2007): 94-99.
Abstract: This article provides a response to two of the papers [including
Roth's] in the collection. In doing so it takes up two issues: the
conceptualization and analysis of discourse within Cultural Historical
Activity Theory (CHAT) and notions of identity and subject positioning
within CHAT. Bernstein [(2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity:
Theory research critique (revised edition). Oxford: Rowman and
Littlefield.] and Hasan [(2005). Semiotic mediation, language and society:
Three exotripic theories--Vygotsky, Halliday and Bernstein. In J.J.
Webster (Ed.), Language, society and consciousness: Ruqaiya Hasan. London:
Equinox.] inform the commentary.
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Tony Whitson wrote:
> Thanks, Michael,
>
> Here's the abstract of that article:
>
> Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT), which had been termed the
> best-held secret of education about 15 years ago, has had an exponential
> growth over the past three decades. Because it thematizes largely the
> structural aspects of activity systems, the theory only recently has been
> developed to include emotional, motivational, and identity-related aspects of
> everyday human praxis. Identity itself is a difficult concept so that we are
> only at the beginning of understanding how to theorize it. In this article, I
> use empirical data from my ethnographic fieldwork in one rural community
> generally and its middle school specifically to expand CHAT so that it can be
> used to theorize identity and its relation to the moral nature of agency. The
> inclusion becomes possible through the concept of action, which is central to
> CHAT, identity, and agency.
>
> 2007, Wolff-Michael Roth wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I hesitated in letting you know, because I have no intention or need for
>> self-promotion. But some may be interested in this paper in which I
>> develop a CHAT position on identity; and it appeared in a special issue
>> that our CHAT colleague Julian Williams from Manchester University had
>> edited. Cheers, Michael
>>
>> Roth, W.-M. (2007). The ethico-moral nature of identity: Prolegomena to
>> the development of third-generation cultural-historical activity theory.
>> International Journal of Educational Research, 46, 83-93.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
Tony Whitson
UD School of Education
NEWARK DE 19716
twhitson@udel.edu
_______________________________
"those who fail to reread
are obliged to read the same story everywhere"
-- Roland Barthes, S/Z (1970)
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Sat Nov 24 07:53 PST 2007