These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
It is so interesting to me that this area of research holds within its
realm references beyond the work of CHAT and socio-cultural study. The
thesis adams and aizawa present is grounded in positivist thinking and only
relates merely to a subject-object world. Dialectic relations are ignored
and their argument states nothing of culture or contextual boundaries. In
my view it is a very short-sighted work. Here is a web address for a reply
to the paper:
http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/1842/1443/1/coupling2.pdf
However, in this rebuttal there is no mention of cultural contexts either.
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Thu Dec 6 07:15 PST 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 07 2008 - 10:13:50 PST