These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
I am clearly out of my depth here, but the notion of dialogue I was "thinking" about _is_ one of unity. Thinking is always "about" something, a connection is implied. That connection is the unity, the yin and yang, so to speak. They are transactional in Dewey's felicitous phrase. Dynamic. When I say we have to think together it suggests that the unity that results requires connections to make something unique. It cannot be a process of separates acting independently and somehow influencing one another.
Of course I learned most of what I know about Zen from Robert Pirsig and connect it to motorcycle maintenance.
Juan, I have only briefly explored meditation, but it seemed to me that the concept of mindfulness was exactly about experiencing these unities, these connections, seeing the world with fresh eyes.
-----Original Message-----
From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Juan Felipe Espinosa Cristià
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 8:38 PM
To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: Re: [xmca] cognition bounded?
Yes but the essence of Zen is the non duality that you can feel in meditation
states.
Juan
Paul Dillon escribió:
> The classic Zen (or Chan) Buddhist dialogue is the koan. e.g,, Does a dog
> have Buddha nature? or How much does mu weigh? The answers to these always
> depend on a direct intuitive experience that cannot be rationally deduced.
>
> In that light an actvity theoretic koan occurred to me thinking about the
> thread on "mind": Where are you when you're minding your own business?
>
> Paul
>
> Ana Marjanovic-Shane <ana@zmajcenter.org> wrote:
> It is interesting that you connect Zen with dialogic thought!
> Ana
>
> Cunningham, Donald James wrote:
>> Not to get too Zen here, but if, as many argue, thinking is dialogical, we
>> cannot think without another, real or imagined.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On
>> Behalf Of Ana Marjanovic-Shane
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:17 PM
>> To: mcole@weber.ucsd.edu; eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
>> Subject: Re: [xmca] cognition bounded?
>>
>> With whom are we thinking?
>> Ana
>>
>> Mike Cole wrote:
>>
>>> With what are we thinking, Don?
>>> mike
>>>
>>> On Dec 5, 2007 4:43 PM, Cunningham, Donald James
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Eugene, should your signature question be "What do we think?" instead of
>>>> "What do you think?"? Or "What are we thinking with? [forgive the
>>>> grammar!]?
>>>>
>>>> Don Cunningham
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On
>>>> Behalf Of Eugene Matusov
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 10:46 AM
>>>> To: mcole@weber.ucsd.edu
>>>> Cc: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>>>> Subject: RE: [xmca] cognition bounded?
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mike and everybody-
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Let me add my 3 cents (dollar is going down ;-) for this discussion. I
>>>> think
>>>> it is better to use the verb "to mind" or "minding" than the noun "the
>>>> mind"
>>>> since we often refer to a process rather than to a thing. In general, I
>>>> agree with Mike, of course. But let tell you an anecdote to illustrate the
>>>> "distributed" (or discursive?) nature of the minding process.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A few days ago, when I was leaving my work, I could not find my car in the
>>>> university 4-store building parking garage. As my memory has been getting
>>>> more and more mature ;-) every day, I knew that it would happen one day
>>>> and
>>>> that day came. While I was frustrating in my search running from one
>>>> store
>>>> of the parking garage to another, I realized that on the top of forgetting
>>>> where I had parked my car, I forget to pick up a video camera from my lab
>>>> for next day videotaped observation of Lego-Logo Robotics activities at
>>>> the
>>>> Latin-American Community Center. With even more frustration, I went back
>>>> to
>>>> my lab to pick up the camera. At the lab, I realized that I forgot to send
>>>> a
>>>> web announcement to my undergrad students about reading for upcoming class
>>>> discussion. I sent the announcement and made some emails, and did some
>>>> other
>>>> work while I was in lab. When I finished, I realized that it took about 2
>>>> hours. I came back to the parking garage (with the video camera this time)
>>>> to resume the search of my car, the garage was almost empty, and I found
>>>> my
>>>> car very easily. I was thinking about my "strategy" of "waiting" until the
>>>> garage became empty, "That was smart!" Now I am thinking, where was my
>>>> mind?
>>>> Did I have mind at all? Was it minding? Was it MY minding? Did I lose mind
>>>> and then found? Does mind, like sh..., sometimes simply happen?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Or is "my mind" a historical and cultural form of discourse for me to
>>>> notice/recognize certain things and use them in future (like in future
>>>> when
>>>> I lose my car in the UD parking garage I might stop frustrating and stop
>>>> useless searching efforts and just go back to my office to work more
>>>> waiting
>>>> until cars will be gone from the garage)? Is "the mind" reification of
>>>> this
>>>> discourse?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eugene
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------
>>>>
>>>> Eugene Matusov, Ph.D.
>>>>
>>>> Professor of Education
>>>>
>>>> School of Education
>>>>
>>>> University of Delaware
>>>>
>>>> Newark, DE 19716, USA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> email: ematusov@udel.edu
>>>>
>>>> fax: 1-(302)-831-4110
>>>>
>>>> website: http://ematusov.soe.udel.edu
>>>>
>>>> publications: http://ematusov.soe.udel.edu/vita/publications.htm
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Mike Cole [mailto:lchcmike@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 11:45 PM
>>>> To: Eugene Matusov
>>>> Subject: Fwd: [xmca] cognition bounded?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Mike Cole
>>>> Date: Dec 4, 2007 8:44 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [xmca] cognition bounded?
>>>> To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity"
>>>> Cc: Kevin Rocap >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This appears to be the responibility of Deleware and Louisiana. Eugene and
>>>> David?
>>>>
>>>> My view? OF COURSE the mind is in the head.... but not only. If it were
>>>> only
>>>> in the head it would stay
>>>> there and not kill people. Too damned good at killing people as it is!
>>>> mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 4, 2007 8:16 PM, Juan Felipe Espinosa Cristià >>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kevin Rocap escribió:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Then who's minding the store? ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Juan Felipe Espinosa Cristià wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear All:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An online paper from the authors is at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.udel.edu/Philosophy/papers/adams2007.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They said that "the mind is still in the head".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Juan Felipe Espinosa C.
>>>>>> jfespino@uc.cl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/4/07 11:20 AM, "Peter Smagorinsky" < smago@uga.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks Martin--always useful to see a contrary perspective. The
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>> descriptor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> says that the book:
>>>>>>>> "Articulates and defends the "mark of the cognitive", a common sense
>>>>>>>> theory
>>>>>>>> used to distinguish between cognitive and non-cognitive processes"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I always wonder about "common sense" arguments, and the author's
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>> belief
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> they are beyond culture.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peter Smagorinsky
>>>>>>>> The University of Georgia
>>>>>>>> 125 Aderhold Hall
>>>>>>>> Athens, GA 30602
>>>>>>>> smago@uga.edu/phone:706-542-4507
>>>>>>>> http://www.coe.uga.edu/lle/faculty/smagorinsky/index.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>> xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Behalf Of Martin Packer
>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 10:56 AM
>>>>>>>> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
>>>>>>>> Subject: [xmca] cognition bounded?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please find below news of the latest books from Blackwell Publishing
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>> in
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>> chosen subject areas.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To find out more about a particular title, download sample chapters
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>> or
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>> examination copies online* click on "more information".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Bounds of Cognition
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> By: Frederick Adams(University of Delaware) and Kenneth
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>> Aizawa(Centenary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> College of Louisiana)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> An alarming number of philosophers and cognitive scientists have
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>> argued
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> mind extends beyond the brain and body. This book evaluates these
>>>>>>>> arguments
>>>>>>>> and suggests that, typically, it does not.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More Information
>>>>>>>> http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/book.asp?ref=9781405149143
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----------------------------
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> xmca mailing list
>>>>>>>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>>>>>>>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> xmca mailing list
>>>>>>>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>>>>>>>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> xmca mailing list
>>>>>>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>>>>>>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Juan Felipe Espinosa Cristià
>>>> e-mail: jfespino@uc.cl
>>>> http://jfespino.wordpress.com/
>>>>
>>>> 077070969/3624774
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> xmca mailing list
>>>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>>>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> xmca mailing list
>>>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>>>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> xmca mailing list
>>>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>>>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> xmca mailing list
>>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>>
>>>
>>> __________ NOD32 2705 (20071205) Information __________
>>>
>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> //
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> /Ana Marjanovic-Shane, Ph.D./
>> /151 W. Tulpehocken St./
>>
>> /Philadelphia//, PA 19144///
>>
>> /(h) 215-843-2909/
>>
>> /ana@zmajcenter.org /
>>
>> /http://www.speakeasy.org/~anamshane
>> /
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>
>>
>> __________ NOD32 2706 (20071206) Information __________
>>
>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> //
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> /Ana Marjanovic-Shane, Ph.D./
> /151 W. Tulpehocken St./
>
> /Philadelphia//, PA 19144///
>
> /(h) 215-843-2909/
>
> /ana@zmajcenter.org /
>
> /http://www.speakeasy.org/~anamshane
> /
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it
> now.
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
--
Juan Felipe Espinosa Cristià
e-mail: jfespino@uc.cl
http://jfespino.wordpress.com/
077070969/3624774
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Thu Dec 6 18:20 PST 2007