These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Dear Mark.
I am eager to look at your work on collaboration and reflective
teaching. Where would I find it?
Thanks,
Vera John-Steiner
Mark deBoer wrote:
> Hi Sarah,
>
> I just wanted to properly reply to your mail and to make a few comments.
>
> Sound like your PBL is a lot like the TBL (Task Based Learning) that
> goes on in the ESL/EFL classrooms. It was introduced by a number of
> people, mainly Willis and Willis, and from there many others have
> followed suit to give a more heuristic approach to language learning.
>
> The problem with TBL though is that there is a lot of pair work and the
> the social interaction doesn't happen, or there is no accountability on
> the par of the teacher 'What was the point of today's lesson?'. As I am
> starting to discover, there is no 'right' way to teach English, and
> despite the response I'll get from this comment - I think
> Kumaravadivelu has the best approach - beyond methods... in which the
> idea is not to teach but to look for learning opportunities in the
> classroom. I have taken this approach in developing the V-task
> methodology.
>
> In your setting though it seems almost ideal that you look at PBL, the
> students need to, in a social interactive setting be able to deduce the
> problems and discuss the outcomes. In this kind of situation though,
> why do you not also look at the Activity Theory? In my recent study of
> collaboration, and reflective teaching, I looked at a number of various
> theories and discovered that the interaction that occurs needs also to
> be looked at from the point of outcomes - as was stated earlier - the
> outcomes you can never see, they are always on the horizon. When it
> comes to PBL, or TBL, the point of training or discovering something
> new in the interactive setting always will lead to new outcomes, in
> other words the training is never complete. The roles of each person in
> the setting becomes important, especially in course work.
>
> I will look up your references that you mentioned. Thank you very much
> for the direction!
>
> Happy New Year!
>
> Mark
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
--
---------------------------------
Vera P. John-Steiner
Department of Linguistics
Humanities Bldg. 526
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, NM 87131
(505) 277-6353 or 277-4324
Internet: vygotsky@unm.edu
---------------------------------
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Thu Jan 3 13:43 PST 2008