These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
I need to retract the claim I made a couple of weeks ago about Vygotsky
mistaking an idea of Hegel's for Plekhanov's. Having looked at Plekhanov on
Romanitc art and re-reading what Vygotsky said about it, I think I
exaggerated the closeness of the idea to Hegel, and Vygotsky accurately
reflects Plekhanov's view which is very different from Hegel's.
Apologies.
Andy
At 10:12 AM 6/02/2008 +1100, you wrote:
>(2) In "The Psychology of Art" Vygotsky quotes Plekhanov's idea of
>Romantic art, but what is quoted is from Hegel, and it is sufficiently
>idiosyncratic so that either Plekhanov either simply mentioned Hegel's
>idea or copied it as his own, or LSV got mixed up about his source.
>...
>Andy
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Wed Feb 20 01:57 PST 2008