These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Thanks, Eric. This chapter is the introduction to a book Mark Tappan and I
edited, "Cultural and Critical Perspectives on Human Development," published
by SUNY Press in 2001. It's still available. In fact on Amazon a used copy
can be had for 86c!
<http://www.amazon.com/Cultural-Critical-Perspectives-Human-Development/dp/0
791451801/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1204726685&sr=8-1>
Marti
On 3/3/08 3:25 PM, "ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org" <ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org> wrote:
>
> I thought I would share with all who are interested in culture and its
> impact upon human development.
>
> http://compsci.duq.edu/~packer/Pubs/PDFs/2001%20Packer&T.pdf
>
> great summary!
>
> eric
>
>
>
> Martin Packer
> <packer@duq.edu> To: "eXtended Mind,
> Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
> Sent by: cc:
> xmca-bounces@web Subject: Re: [xmca] If all
> hopes are lost for establishing a more workable
> er.ucsd.edu social system , then
> please tell me where A.N.Leontyev has gone wrong with
> his definition of
> "Personal Meaning"
>
> 03/01/2008 05:16
> PM
> Please respond
> to "eXtended
> Mind, Culture,
> Activity"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3/1/08 2:37 PM, "Mike Cole" <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If there
>> is cultural evolution, or progress in history, how does one adopt a
> cultural
>> historical, activity perspective that declares thinking to be functional
>> systems that include the accumulated
>> artifacts of the community without concluding that thinking in, say, a
> small
>> agricultural village high in the Andes just to pick up on Paul's current
>> environment, is less complex because
>> the range of activities seems limited, the mediational means limited,
>> etc.?
>
> I think this is a central conundrum, and I'm trying to sort out my
> thoughts.
>
> First, I keep having to remind myself that progress is not a characteristic
> that history possesses in itself. Progress is a story we tell about
> history.
> At best, it's told by the survivors. At worst, by the victors. There's a
> wonderful, horrifying book that offers a people's history, documenting the
> 'rise' of American civilization on the backs of the indigenous and the
> poor... (I've lost the title.)
>
> Second, I think Marx's own account of history was complex and probably
> contradictory. (I need to check Hayden White's Metahisory for his reading
> of
> Marx's narratives.) For example, capitalism develops workers' capacities,
> albieit in a lop-sided manner, while it exploits them. Capitalism leads to
> socialism, indeed it's a necessary step. but in large part this is because
> it generates the greatest misery for masses of people, who finally can take
> no more. No simple progress here.
>
> Third, it's interesting to compare the chapters in Ape, Primitive, Child
> written by Vygotsy with those written by Luria. The former seem to me more
> nuanced. Vygotsky writes very evocatively and sensitively about the
> psychology of 'primitive' peoples. The richness of their vocabulary, for
> example, is lost when their language becomes more abstract.
>
> And according to the notes I was taking when reading this book, "Even in
> Luriašs writing about his expedition [to Uzbekistan] two voices can be
> discerned, two distinct and competing conceptualizations of the changes he
> observed. Let us begin there." My notes, sadly, stop there! And the book is
> not here.
>
> Third, when there are qualitative reognizations, judgments of progress are
> no easy matter. Kuhn taught us that paradigms are 'incommensurate': there
> is
> no common measure to judge them by, because each of the criteria is
> internal
> to a paradigm.
>
> I guess that just as physicists have become accustomed to the need to make
> assessments such as 'faster' or 'slower' always relative to a frame of
> reference, we have to do the same. History may have been progress judged
> from the frame of some anglo-saxon white males, but... and the cognition of
> a mountain villager may be assessed as embodying important forms of wisdom
> from the perspective of people searching for a way to stop damaging the
> planet.
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Wed Mar 5 06:23 PST 2008