These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

Re: [xmca] Antirecapitulationism and the Logical Impossiblity of Social Progress

From: Ed Wall <ewall who-is-at umich.edu>
Date: Sun Apr 06 2008 - 13:34:07 PDT

Martin

    I don't know how helpful this is but Robert de Beaugrande has a
paper which discusses this particular interpretation of Halliday at
http://www.beaugrande.com/WiddowsonianDiscourse.htm. It seems to be
in Widdowson, H.G. 2000. 'On the limitations of linguistics applied.'
Applied Linguistics 21/1: 3-5 (I don't have access or the paper)
although it is difficult to tell and he notes, I think there, that
Widdowson is referring, for the most part, to the Preface of the 1994
An Introduction to Function Grammar (unfortunately I have the second
edition).
    For Vygotsky and Halliday, you might look to Hasan, I think there
is a paper in the MCA Archives.

    Oh, I think you mean Fairclough

Ed

>David,
>
>A clarification question, please.
>
>> I think that's why Halliday, who has an explicitly Vygotskyan conception of
>> consciousness as a form of social being from the get-go,
>
>I assume you're referring to Halliday's "Learning How to Mean" (1975)? A
>great book, for sure! By an explicitly Vygotskian position do you mean that
>Halliday was citing Vygotsky, or that his position was one very similar to
>Vygotsky's but without direct influence?
>
>And since I'm in this mode, there's a question I've been wanting to ask
>about a post of yours I saved back in 2006. You said (in a discussion of
>Firewalls [?]):
>
>" Widdowson complains that Halliday's grammar implies that we can simply
>"read off" meaning from a text, without inspecting the context. You can
>easily see where he gets that impresssion; Halliday tells us, on the very
>first page of the grammar, that this is what his grammar intends to do."
>
>It would be very helpful for other stuff I'm working on to know the citation
>for Widdowson, and also for Halliday's grammar (On Grammar, 2005?).
>
>thanks!
>
>Martin
>
>
>On 4/3/08 6:23 PM, "David Kellogg" <vaughndogblack@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> I think that's why Halliday, who has an explicitly Vygotskyan conception of
>> consciousness as a form of social being from the get-go
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>xmca mailing list
>xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca

_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Sun Apr 6 13:38 PDT 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 01 2008 - 17:14:13 PDT