These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Hello again! :)
I fully agree to the different levels (I think I mentioned something
along these lines myself --> this is mentioned not to "insist" on my
point, but rather to explain how I really think it is the case! :-).
I think the key point is exactly to make sure we all understand and
share which level it is we are discussing (and I do hope I did not sound
to nitty-gritty, if anything it is an indication of how much I have to
learn!), and I am most grateful (again!) for the clarification of a
possible source of misunderstanding (overloaded/reused terminology
that could lead to long disputes/distract from addressing the actual
phenomena of interest.)
A particular interest of mine in fact lies in understanding better the
nature of the "natural-scientific" divide, what the "natural-scientific"
contribution can and cannot identify (not sure it serves the cause if
I point at Dilthey, Dewey, Husserl...Blumenberg, Clancey, Feltovich,
etc.: this is just meant to help "place" me.)
Apologies for the too many words, too --
and a very good start into the working week!
Paolo
On Sun, 25 May 2008, Michalis Kontopodis wrote:
> Subject: Re: [xmca] Re: Re[2]:
> Aufforderungscharakter/Valence/Affordance/Lewin/Gibson
>
> That is very interesting, Mike and Paolo et al
>
> However I would hesitate to bring the natural-scientific approach of Gibson
> so close to that of Vygotsky.
>
> Let's think of an example:
>
> A carpet is soft. It has the affordance to step on it without producing any
> noise.
>
> Because of this affordance it INVITES libraries to use it
> (Aufforderungscharakter), so that students can work with concentration even
> if other students are walking here and there.
>
> I see here two different levels of analysis.
>
> ?
>
>
>
>
>
> Michalis Kontopodis
>
> research associate
> humboldt university berlin
> tel.: +49 (0) 30 2093 3716
> fax.: +49 (0) 30 2093 3739
> http://www.csal.de
> http://www.iscar.org/de/culthistanthpsy/
>
>
>
>
> On May 25, 2008, at 10:36 PM, Mike Cole wrote:
>
>> 2008/5/25 Boris Meshcheryakov <borlogic@orexovo.net>:
>>
>>> Another note from Boris. In a small introduction to D.B. Elkonin's book
>>> on the *Psychology of Play (1978)* Vygotsky some notes on preschool play
>>> in which is contained the following fragment:
>>>
>> "Here the action arises from the meaning of things, and not the things (in
>> themselves) -- Aufforderungscharacter.
>>
>> This is all REALLY interesting. I knew of no prior connection of the idea
>> of
>> affordance to Gibson's work, I knew that Gibson and Zaporozhets were close
>> colleagues, and I think the emphasis on
>> the relational nature of affordances ("the meaning of objects, not the
>> objects") is important..... although Boris' examples, and Neisser's, may
>> make affordances closer to the SENSE of objects
>> than their meanings. not sure, perhaps both/and.
>> mike
>>
>>>
>>> .. " " (1978) :
>>> .. - ..
>>> (. 289-294).
>>>
>>> , : «
>>> , Aufforderungscharacter» (. 292).
>>>
>>> : «,
>>> » (.).
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> ,
>>>
>>> ..
>>> mailto:borlogic@orexovo.net<borlogic@orexovo.net>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
--
Paolo Petta +43-1-5336112-12(Tel)
Austrian Research Inst. for Artificial Intelligence +43-1-5336112-77(Fax)
Freyung 6/6, A 1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe Paolo.Petta <@> ofai.at
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Sun May 25 15:59 PDT 2008