These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
This paragraph is from Vygotsky's The history of the development of higher
mental functions, 1998, vol. 4, and appears in the very beginning of
Chapter 2 (second paragraph of the English text), p. 27:
http://books.google.com/books?id=Wvy8rt0kzf0C&pg=PT51&sig=h4_jo_H1Zg7B0w25Jj6gENT-NS8#PPT51,M1
Here is the 1998 version of the quote:
... Finding a method is one of the most important tasks of the researcher.
The method in such cases is simultaneously a prerequisite and product, a
tool and a result of the research...
> David Kellogg wrote:
> > Does anyone know where this quotation ORIGINALLY comes from?
> >
> > "(T)he search for method becomes one of the most important problems of
> the entire enterprise of understanding the uniquely human forms of
> psychological activity. In this case, the method is simultaneously
> prerequisite and product, the tool and the result of the study. (italics
> in the original)"
> >
> > It's p. 65 of Mind in Society. But that chapter is made up of Chapter
> Three of the History of the Development of the Higher Mental Functions,
> in Volume Four of the Collected Works.
> >
> > The weird thing is that I can find the passages right before and right
> after this italicized thing, but the italicized bit itself is simply not
> there.
> >
> > Could it one of those interstitial interpolations that Gillen (2000)
> complains about? Since it is in italics, I can't believe it was written
> by one of the editors (Mike???). I remember hearing once that the
> main part of this book was a manuscript translated by Luria--did it come
> from there?
> >
> > Can anyone help?
> >
> > David Kellogg
> > Seoul National University of Education
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Andy Blunden http://home.mira.net/~andy/ +61 3 9380 9435
> Skype andy.blunden
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
__________________________________________________________________
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
http://www.flickr.com/gift/
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Fri May 30 19:03 PDT 2008