These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
So, who has a list of the ISI journals? Anyone willing to share?
Cathrene
The BIG down side is total assimilation to the existing mainstream, David.
>
> I personally suggest a multi-valenced approach that includes ISI highly
> rated journals and
> deviant ones, like MCA.
>
> Michael left out part of the GOOD news. MCA has a rating that should win
> it
> ISI inclusion by year's end.
>
> I assume the PLAY article for discussion made it to everyone. People
> reading
> this weekend?
> mike
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 1:50 PM, David Preiss <davidpreiss@uc.cl> wrote:
>
>> As a young scholar, I totally ENDORSE this petition, Michael. Indeed, I
>> have always thought that MCA`s influence and intellectual appeal is not
>> commensurate to its lack of inclusion in ISI. Alas, ISI! No chance but
>> to
>> play according to its rules, I guess.
>> david
>>
>>
>> On Jul 4, 2008, at 4:39 PM, Wolff-Michael Roth wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>> Mike and I have had a conversation off line. He suggested I should
>>> write
>>> to the list. It concerns the increasing pressure on all of us to
>>> publish in
>>> "good" journals, and universities increasingly use as a measure the
>>> presence
>>> and impact factor ranking in ISI Web of Science as a measure. This is
>>> especially true for Asian countries and other countries. With my
>>> graduate
>>> students, we always make selections based on this criterion, because I
>>> want
>>> them to be successful in their home countries and careers.
>>>
>>> In the sciences, this has long been common practice; now the social
>>> sciences are swept up by the same trend. I have recently been
>>> bombarded by
>>> publishers whose journals have increased in their impact factor.
>>> Furthermore, there are a number of companies that make the rankings of
>>> their
>>> journal a key bit of information on the website.
>>>
>>> (Some of) You may be asking what this has to do with you. Well, since I
>>> have been editing journals (besides MCA, I also do CULTURAL STUDIES OF
>>> SCIENCE EDUCATION and FQS: FORUM QUALITATIVE SOCIAL RESEARCH), I have
>>> been
>>> asked by new faculty members about rejection rates, rankings, etc. And
>>> I
>>> have been asked by department heads and deans as well.
>>>
>>> Some may decide to opt out, which would come with dire consequences for
>>> many, who might find themselves in the position of not being tenured or
>>> promoted.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, we (MCA) currently are not in ISI Web of Science, which
>>> places those of you who publish in the journal in an unfortunate
>>> situation.
>>>
>>> One of the ways in which you, the community as a whole can be proactive
>>> producing the conditions that would convince ISI to make MCA one of the
>>> listed and ranked journals is to make it a habit to cite RECENT
>>> articles you
>>> have been reading in MCA. Here is why:
>>>
>>> The impact factor for 2007 (which is what was made available just a few
>>> days ago), for example, is calculated using the following formula:
>>>
>>> Number of citations in 2007 referencing
>>> articles
>>> published in 2005 and 2006
>>> impact factor =
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Number of citable articles
>>> published
>>> in 2005 and 2006
>>>
>>> (They may not take into account self-citation, but I am not sure)
>>>
>>> So the impact factor is 1 when a journal had 60 references from the
>>> outside while having published 60 articles (over 2005 and 2006).
>>>
>>> You see, as a community, you can help yourself by citing MCA work in
>>> other
>>> journals. With high rankings, MCA will be included in ISI and then you
>>> and
>>> your peers will be rated higher at your institution because it is part
>>> of
>>> ISI.
>>>
>>> Have a nice weekend all of you,
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>>> Wolff-Michael Roth, Editor-in-Chief
>>> MIND, CULTURE, AND ACTIVITY
>>> Email: mroth@uvic.ca
>>> Journal: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/1074-9039
>>> Submissions: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/mca
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> xmca mailing list
>>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>>
>>
>> David Preiss, Ph.D.
>> Subdirector de Extensión y Comunicaciones
>> Escuela de Psicología
>> Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
>> Av Vicuña Mackenna - 4860
>> 7820436 Macul
>> Santiago, Chile
>>
>> Fono: 3544605
>> Fax: 3544844
>> e-mail: davidpreiss@uc.cl
>> web personal: http://web.mac.com/ddpreiss/
>> web institucional: http://www.epuc.cl/profesores/dpreiss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Fri Jul 4 16:42 PDT 2008