These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Colin,
I would assert that individuals who do not formally read or write are
politically marginalized, however, I am curious what measure, standards,
or means allow you to contend that "pre-literate" individuals or peoples
are "culturally impoverished"? Your sentiment sounds a little too much why
my illiterate ancestors left Ireland after the anti-Catholic laws were
enacted.
Cathrene
Eric,
>
> No one, I hope, would suggest that to be 'pre-literate' is to lack highly
> developed mental functions. However, to be
> 'pre-literate' in today's world - thanks to phylogensis, to be sure - is
> to be culturally and politically impoverished. Most
> preliteracy today is a political scandal, along with other forms of
> impoverishment.
>
> A handful of billionaires are worth more in money terms than forty whole
> countries. Read this, and employ those higher mental
> functions!
>
> Colin
>
> Before acting on this email or opening any attachments you should read the
> Manchester
> Metropolitan University's email disclaimer available on its website
> http://www.mmu.ac.uk/emaildisclaimer
>>>> <ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org> 07/09/08 2:30 PM >>>
>
> Colin:
> you wrote:
>
> We can 'converse' across the oceans, and
> with the dead and the not-yet born, in ways that 'pre-literate' peoples
> could not imagine. To enable the largest possible part of
> humanity to have access to the fruits of literacy is, thus, to empower
> them
> socially, rather than to 'engineer' them.
>
>
> I like the sentiment, I truely do, but I have met many so called
> 'pre-literates' that have highly developed mental functions and carry out
> incredibly complex activities. This development is the ontogenetic
> process. When you generalize to the vast digest of human literary output
> I
> step out into the abyss and state this would be the phylogenetic
> development of the human species and not an individual's ontogeny. Does
> that make sense or do I float unsupported?
>
> eric
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Wed Jul 9 13:57 PDT 2008