These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
David, Mike,
Perhaps, Vygotsky's concept of 'crisis' was not exactly coincident
to the Leontiev's one. Maybe they shares a same polissemic
'semantic field', but not necessarily the same 'objectal reference'.
Vygotsky's crisis seems to be like a structural-dinamic actual process
imanent to dialectical revoluctionary (involution-evolution) development.
The Leontiev's crisis seems to be a secondary meaninful process that
subjects can live/feel or not, in function of especific social relations,
seems to be a kind of meta-crisis, the social-personal situational meaning
of the crisis itself, in Vygotsky's dialectical-ontological sense.
Maybe the first kind of crisis can not be controled and guided, even we
wish to potencialize development... the second one, I don't know...
It's what it seems to me.
Best wishes
Achilles
Umuarama, July 22, 2008
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:03:24 -0700
> From: lchcmike@gmail.com
> To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> Subject: Re: [xmca] New Book: Zones of Proletarian Development
>
> Fascinating juxtaposition of Vygotsky and Leontiev on crises, David.
> From Leninism to Stalinism?
> mike
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Wayne Au <wau@exchange.fullerton.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes David, thankfully, I did avoid seeking a causal connection between
> > Lenin
> > and Vygotsky!
> >
> > I just wanted to let folks know that I am lurking on this board, but
> > haven't
> > posted before due to some technical issues - hopefully Bruce and I have
> > worked out the problem.
> >
> > At any rate I am greatly flattered (and also intimidated) by the discussion
> > here about my paper (special thanks to Shirley for saying such nice things
> > in her last post and to Steve for bringing it up earlier in the year), and
> > am happy to continue the discussion 'in person' now that I can post to the
> > list.
> >
> > Some of us have also got a panel at ISCAR on Marxism and Vygotsky, so
> > hopefully we can talk more then as well.
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> > [Side Note: At the time I also wanted to post regarding peer review - since
> > I am an editor for Rethinking Schools. Our board operates as a collective,
> > and no submission is 'blind', but as many of us are present at meetings
> > offer comments and discuss every submission (including our own). So what
> > happens is we end up with a very critical collective review process - all
> > of
> > us have been teachers and expect the articles to be useful and readable for
> > teachers - and I think we have one of the most rigorous review processes
> > I've ever seen. Yet, we are a very low status journal because we aren't so
> > much interested in academic research, but in writing that classroom
> > teachers
> > feel like they can engage with. My publications in Rethinking Schools
> > certainly barely help me get tenure, and if I were at an R-1 institution,
> > they would just laugh at the prospect of taking Rethinking Schools
> > seriously.]
> >
> > Wayne Au
> > Assistant Professor
> > Department of Secondary Education
> > CSU Fullerton
> > P.O. Box 6868
> > Fullerton, CA 92834
> > Office: 714.278.5481
> > Editorial Board Member: Rethinking Schools (www.rethinkingschools.org)
> > http://ed.fullerton.edu/SecEd/Faculty/Full_Time_Faculty/Au.html
> >
> > On 7/22/08 9:48 AM, 'David Kellogg' <vaughndogblack@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > My world history professor at University of Chicago was a guy called
> > MacNeill
> > > who wrote something called 'The Rise of the West'. That's all you really
> > need
> > > to know about world history, according to MacNeill (and all you really
> > need to
> > > know about MacNeill according to me).
> > >
> > > Anyway, one of the games he used to play to while away the long hours
> > before
> > > our final exam and his retirement was based on finding far flung
> > parallels
> > > between cultures and then explaining them. He had a few tropes for doing
> > this,
> > > but they were all unmediated; cultures learned things from other
> > cultures,
> > > usually via direct diffusion (and yet when I suggested that all the books
> > he
> > > had ever written and printed on paper were invented in China he scowled).
> > >
> > > I think that Au, thankfully, avoids this; he pretty much leaves open the
> > > question of whether the undoubted influences of Lenin's work on
> > Vygotsky's was
> > > direct or mediated. This is a wise move; they were doubtless both.
> > >
> > > But it also leaves open the question of what the mediated sources of
> > influence
> > > were, and whether there was any reciprocally mediated influence by
> > Vygotsky or
> > > Vygotsky-like thinkers on Lenin or other state leaders.
> > >
> > > An important means by which Lenin's work influenced Vygotsky was highly
> > > indirect: the Russian formalists and the futurists and the whole literary
> > > critical reaction to the romantic subjectivist view of language and
> > meaning.
> > > By the late nineteenth century, there were already two important currents
> > > arguing that, contrary to romantic ideas of inspiration and philological
> > lines
> > > of study that located meaning in texts, meaning really comes to language
> > from
> > > outside the self. Not all of these were particularly 'progressive'; T.S.
> > > Eliot, for example, argued that literary 'inspiration' is a matter of
> > building
> > > in almost imperceptible ways on a tradition that exists almost entirely
> > > outside the writer. Formalism and futurism took this to an extreme:
> > meaning
> > > comes ENTIRELY from outside the self, and Lenin's and
> > Trotsky's relationship
> > > to formalism and futurism (one of critical distance) is noticeably
> > similar to
> > > LSV's own in Psychology of Art.
> > >
> > > How did child psychology become important enough for the government to
> > issue a
> > > decree banning pedology, intelligence testing, and LSV's work? A couple
> > of
> > > months ago I read Bukharin's 'Philosophical Arabesques', one of four
> > books he
> > > wrote while awaiting execution. There is a great deal on how children
> > learn
> > > language, some of it clearly directed towards creating the idea of a
> > child who
> > > is almost entirely socio-culturally determined, a kind of human
> > counterpart to
> > > the wheat that Lysenko was creating at that time.
> > >
> > > Bukharin doesn't touch on one of the most obvious philosophical problems
> > > raised by Vygotsky's theory of child development, that is, the crisis.
> > Crises
> > > are, of course, and inevitable feature of cultural historical change
> > according
> > > to Lenin and they are equally unavoidable in child development according
> > to
> > > Vygotsky:
> > >
> > > 'Facts show that in other conditions of rearing, the crisis occurs
> > > differently. In children who go from nursery school to kindergarten, the
> > > crisis occurs differently than it does in chidren who go into
> > kindergarten
> > > from the family. However, the crisis occurs in all normally proceeding
> > child
> > > development; the age of three and the age of seven will always be turning
> > > points in devleopment: there will always be a state of things where the
> > > internal course of the child±s development will conclude a cycle and the
> > > transition to the next cycle will necessarily be a turning point. One age
> > > level is reconstructed in some way in order to allow a new stage of
> > > development to begin.' Volume Five, 1998: 295.
> > >
> > >
> > > But not according to Leontiev:
> > >
> > > 'In fact crises are not at all inevitable accompaniments of psychic
> > > devleopment it is not the crises that are inevitable but the turning
> > points or
> > > breaks the qualitative shifts in development. The crisis on the contrary
> > is
> > > evidence that a turning point or shift has not been made in time. There
> > need
> > > by no crises at all if the child's psychic devlopment does not take shape
> > > spontaneously but is a rationally controlled process, controlled
> > upbringing.'
> > > (Leontiev, A.N. (1981) Problems of the Development of the Mind. Moscow:
> > > Progress. 398-399)
> > >
> > >
> > > David Kellogg
> > > Seoul National University of Education
> > >
> > >
> > > PS:
> > >
> > > Andy:
> > >
> > > Still thinking about that post you wrote on video games and changes in
> > modern
> > > warfare. I was thinking that one of the main themes in the history plays
> > of
> > > Shakespeare is the replacement of direct kingly combat (in which the king
> > was
> > > an epic hero representing the nation) with war by proxy. Then I saw this:
> > >
> > > http://www.slate.com/id/2195751/
> > >
> > > Read and shudder!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Mon, 7/21/08, Achilles Delari Junior <achilles_delari@hotmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Achilles Delari Junior <achilles_delari@hotmail.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [xmca] New Book: Zones of Proletarian Development
> > > To: 'eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity' <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
> > > Date: Monday, July 21, 2008, 10:44 AM
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > > Achilles.
> > >
> > >> From: s.franklin@dsl.pipex.com
> > >> Subject: Re: [xmca] New Book: Zones of Proletarian Development
> > >> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:17:26 +0100
> > >> To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > >>
> > >> Here is the Au paper.
> > >> Its great - very interesting application of Vygotsky's perspective on
> > >
> > >> learning academic and everyday concepts with Lenin's on the
> > >> imptorance of leading /teaching/instructing the revolutionary
> > >> development of the proletariat.
> > >> Shirley
> > >>
> > >> On 21 Jul 2008, at 18:07, Mike Cole wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I agree. This looks like a REALLY relevant text to examine. Do not
> > >>> know the
> > >>> Vygotsky and
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Conheça o Windows Live Spaces, a rede de relacionamentos do Messenger!
> > >
> > http://www.amigosdomessenger.com.br/__________________________________________
> > > _____
> > > xmca mailing list
> > > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > xmca mailing list
> > > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >
_________________________________________________________________
Conheça o Windows Live Spaces, a rede de relacionamentos do Messenger!
http://www.amigosdomessenger.com.br/_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Tue Jul 22 18:54 PDT 2008