These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[xmca] cultural historical activity
--- On Sun, 3/8/09, Martin Packer <packer@duq.edu> wrote:
From: Martin Packer <packer@duq.edu>
Subject: Re: [xmca] Hedegaard article
To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Date: Sunday, March 8, 2009, 3:00 PM
I don't know, David. I haven't had time yet to read the Hedegaard
article,
so I can't put the remarks in that context. I presume you're not
proposing
that one ought to categorize Danish culture as pathologically monological,
or nasty. I don't understand how that kind of appeal to "what we in
the
west... recognize" (which "we" is that, exactly?) can claim to
identify the
roots of a failure to think in "fuzzy" terms, not least, of course,
because
it's not exactly a fuzzy way of putting things.
Martin
On 3/8/09 12:20 AM, "David Kellogg" <vaughndogblack@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Dear Martin:
>
> I don't find Jay's comments at all offensive, and they are
simplistic only in
> the sense of being telegraphic (like the word "nasty").
Actually, I find Jay's
> work anything but simplistic; if anything it's a little too nuanced
for my
> purposes (coding data involves a LOT of categorial distinctions!)
>
> I interpreted Jay's comments in the context of Mariane Hedegaard's
article,
> particularly the ending, where Halime is describing her relationship to
the
> Danish language and to the Danish "good life". I'm assuming
that this article
> was written well after the Centre-Right Rasmussen government came to
power (in
> 2001) with, of course, the support of the Bush administration, which they
> promptly returned by embroiling Denmark in the Iraq War.
>
> What is not so well known is that the Rasmussen government is supported by
the
> Dansk Folkeparti of Pia Kjaersgaard, which is the equivalent of Jean Marie
Le
> Pen's Front Nationale in France or Jurg Haidar's neo-fascist
Austrian People's
> Party. This party, which has been shown to be infilitrated by terrorist
> neo-Nazi organizations like Combat 18, opposes all forms of immigration,
> consider white people to be oppressed by the Muslim minority in Denmark,
and
> after 9/11 Kjaersgaard said that the Americans were wrong to call this a
clash
> of civilizations because "There is only one civilization and that is
ours."
>
> Here are some quotations from their parliamentary delegation, just to give
you
> some sense of what Halime is talking about:
>
>
> Morten Messerschmidt, DPP member of Danish Parliament:
>
> "I believe that all Muslim communities are, by definition, loser
communities.
> The Muslims are not capable of critical thinking."[24]
>
> Pia Kjærsgaard's newsletter (February 25, 2002):
>
> "The Social Security Act is passé because it was tailored to a
Danish family
> tradition and work ethic and not to Muslims, for whom it is fair to be
> provided for by others while the wife gives birth to a lot of children.
The
> child benefit grant is being taken advantage of, as an immigrant achieves
a
> record income due to [having] just under a score of children. New
punishment
> limits must be introduced for group rapes because the problem only arrived
> with the vandalism of the many anti-social second-generation
immigrants." [25]
>
> It seems to me that in the USA in the sixties and again today there was a
> fairly common liberal sentiment to the effect that racism was above all
just a
> bad idea, and that since it was nothing more than a bad idea, it could be
> cured fairly easily by a dose of Sidney Poitier or Barack Obama.
>
> The corollary of this sentiment is that, of course, the oppressed must not
be
> allowed to cherish similar bad ideas, not merely because it might provoke
the
> oppressor to even more savage acts of oppression but above all because
racism
> is just a bad idea in general.
>
> Well, it doesn't take much to show that this liberal sentiment is
simply
> wrong. Sidney Poitier did not cure American racism, and neither will
Barack
> Obama. The reason is simple; racism is not "just a bad idea"
but, like any
> other pervasive and systematic ideology, a reflection of real material
> historical conditions.
>
> Specifically, racism reflects the historical conditions of American
slavery,
> European colonialism, and the not merely historical reserve army of the
> unemployed, which is growing by leaps and bounds as we speak. Perhaps
it's
> time to consider the idea that so-called "reverse racism", or
rather, the rage
> of the oppressed, is really NOT part of the problem, but in fact part of
the
> solution.
>
> David Kirshner's colleague, Kaustuv Roy, has written a wonderful book
(Thanks,
> David!) called Neighborhoods of the Plantation which begins with a quote
> from Walter Benjamin on immigration and borders as a means of keeping
> "culture" pure. Benjamin committed suicide when, fleeing the
Nazis, he was not
> allowed to pass from occupied France into Spain :
>
> "Where frontiers are decided the adversary is not simply annihilated;
indeed
> he is accorded rights even when the victor's superiority of power is
complete.
> And these are, in a demonically ambiguous way, 'equal rights', for
both
> parties ot the treat it is the same line that may not be crossed. Here
> appears, in a terribly primitive form, the same mythical ambiguity of laws
> that may not be 'infringed' to which Anatole France refers
satirically when he
> says that 'Poor and rich are equally forbidden to spend the night
under
> bridges.'"
>
> David Kellogg
> Seoul National University of Education
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Attachment:
Monolitos de la Entrada.gif
Description: GIF image
Attachment:
Las jovenes gozan su herencia.gif
Description: GIF image
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca