These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [xmca] a minus times a plus



Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose
And nothing ain't worth nothing honey if it ain't free

3rd stanza
~em

-----Original Message-----
From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu]
On Behalf Of Mike Cole
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 8:11 PM
To: David Kellogg
Cc: Culture ActivityeXtended Mind
Subject: Re: [xmca] a minus times a plus

The translation from math discourse to discourse discourse will almost
certainly help, David.
The teen's dad was very clear about a double negative being a positive.
"Not not caring=caring" but that understanding does not cross
discourse.representational domains.

I thought Joplin's line was "freedom's just another word for nothing
left to
lose."  Hard to remember
stuff from the prior millenium.

mike

PS -- Hmmm, or was that something about the freedom of necessity from
yet
another prior millenium?

PPS-- I'll give your version a try. First chance I get,
mike

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:00 PM, David Kellogg
<vaughndogblack@yahoo.com>wrote:

>
> Mike:
>
> Try the following sentences on your teenager. (Sing where possible!)
>
> a) It's worth it.
> b) It's not worth it.
> c) It's not not worth it.
> d) It's not worth nothing.
> e) Nothing ain't worth nothing but it's free (Kris Kristofferson
version)
> f) Nothing ain't worth nothing hon' if it ain't free. (Janis Joplin
> version)
> (Thanks to an imperfectly anonymous reviewer for MCA for straightening
out
> my discography for the last two examples.)
>
> See if he can explain WHICH sentences mean something is worth it and
which
> ones mean it's not worth it. Of course, this IS related to the notion
of a
> negative operating on a positive to produce a negative.
>
> But how to explain the relationship? I think it's not that systems of
> negation in language are mathematical; it's that systems of negation
in
> MATHEMATICS tend to the linguistic. That's the way ALL higher
psychological
> processes work.
>
> David Kellogg
> Seoul National University of Education
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca