These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
re: Ed Wall message to Michael about matrices.
Here's the modern math-talk about it:-
If _a_ is a 3D transformation/function/mapping represented by square matrix A,
and _b_ is a 3D transformation/function/mapping represented by square matrix B,
then the composite function _a_ @ _b_ ("_b_ followed by _a_" or the
other way round, depending on convention but stick to that convention)
is represented by the matrix AB. functions and matrices are non-commutative
in general. but since
det(AB) = det(A) det(B)
the determinant map det:A |---> det A defines a homomorphism from
square matrices to the integers. this is where you "lose"
non-commutativity. although AB is not the same as BA in general,
det(AB) = det(A) det(B) = det(B) det(A) = det(BA)
when you are back to the numbers-world from your excursion into the
Matrix world,
the commutative law operates again.
Foo Keong
NIE, Singapore