These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Andy, Thanks for replying.It is my understanding that the doctrine among linguists is that since different words are used to refer to the same things in different languages, there must be no absolute, universal relationship between the sounds of words and their "meaning", that meaning being the things to which they refer. Therefore, linguists generally hold that the relationship between sound and meaning is "arbitrary". If we look at relationship between sound and internal emotive state, a new panorama opens up and we see that there is a direct and deep relationship between sound a meaning, that meaning being the emotive states that vocal sounds emanate from and create. That we are affected by the sounds we vocally produce provides us with the raw material for a system of assigning meaning to things simply by naming them. We have nothing other than the affects on us of our words with which to collectively ascertain the affects on us of the things that make up our world. We feel the affects of our vocal sounds internally, intuitively, intimately and with consistency, and all of us who speak the same language share the same basic perception of how we are affected by the things of our world. We process this basic consensus world view through the lens of our own unique self images. One can sense the affect of any vocal sound on one by vocalizing that sound repeatedly while sensing what emotive state/feeling state that sounds stimulates/suggests. Try the sound of the letter, "R", "rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr". Or the sound of the letter, "M", "mmmmmmmmmmmm". Do these sounds conjure up/ suggest any particular state of being? Try the "A" sound and the the "D" sound. I went through the alphabet, from a to z when I first discovered this phenomena and is appeared to me that the sequence of sounds represented by our phonetic alphabet tells a story. I'd like to know if you discern a story in that sequence. If so, a story of what? It may be helpful to note that before the progenitors of we humans used vocal sounds as words to refer to things outside of ourselves, we used them to convey emotional states to one another as other social and somewhat social species do.
Joseph Gilbert On Aug 2, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Andy Blunden wrote:
Joseph, welcome to xmca.I am no linguist Joseph, but I gathered from reading Saussure that linguists in his day (100 years ago) did "look for relationships between sounds and things" because he argued against that idea. But surely, no linguist has looked at it that way in recent times. Who do you have in mind? And surely the idea of sounds relating to emotive states is more relevant to the animal kingdom than culture. Or am I misunderstanding you?Andy Joseph Gilbert wrote:Is our intellectual activity driven by a quest for answers to specific questions, or is it more like a game or sport we engage in for the sake of participating in society? What questions do we ask? I wanted to know why people behave destructively, as they do. I allowed that question to exist for many years until the answer became clear. It related to culture. When we use words, we are making a statement about whatever things we name. By referring to things vocally, we are, virtually, informing ourselves of the affect/meaning of those things. The sounds we utter correlate to emotive states, which we experience subliminally. Consequently, we associate those emotive-feeling states with the things to which the sounds refer. Linguists have been looking for relationships between the sounds of words and the things to which they refer, and have been, for the most part, frustrated by that search. Vocal sounds relate primarily to emotive-feeling states, and only secondarily to the things to which our words refer. Are we able to discover to what emotive states each of our vocal sounds refer? If we would change our human behavior, which is often misidentified as "human nature", we must address the cultural values, the unquestioned givens by which we perceive our world. These givens, these values, our culture, is a result of our language. I would like to share more of this with youall if you want to know more._______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca------------------------------------------------------------------------ --Andy Blunden (Erythrós Press and Media) http://www.erythrospress.com/ Orders: http://www.erythrospress.com/store/main.html#books _______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca