These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Dear Andy,
This paper by Daniel Kahneman and Alan Krueger addresses your question,
I think:
Developments in the Measurement
of Subjective Well-Being
Daniel Kahneman and Alan B. Krueger
Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 20, Number 1—Winter 2006 —Pages
3–24
http://www.krueger.princeton.edu/PDF%20of%20Kahneman%20Krueger%20paper.pdf
According to these authors, self reported measures may be not that bad,
after all.
David
On Nov 10, 2009, at 11:44 PM, Andy Blunden wrote:
I heard another one of those silly reports on the radio just now.
Never mind what it was about, but it reported that x% of people who
did y are happy, whilst of who didn't, only z% are happy, and the
reporter went on to refer to it as an "established fact" that x made
people happy. This "established fact" was gained from people filling
out survey forms, "checking all the boxes" and returning them in the
mail.
It is over 100 years, isn't it, since mainstream, positivist science
(let alone real science) rejected self-reporting of mental states as a
legitimate way of doing psychology. How come it's still going on? Is
this taught at universities, or is it just marketing firms moving in
on the territory?
Andy
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Blunden http://www.erythrospress.com/
Classics in Activity Theory: Hegel, Leontyev, Meshcheryakov, Ilyenkov
$20 ea
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
David Preiss
ddpreiss@me.com
http://web.mac.com/ddpreiss/