These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Thanks Katarina! Any chance of posting a pdf of your 2006 article? The journal is not readily available. mike On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Katarina Rodina <katja@student.uv.uio.no>wrote: > The problem with terminology is a tricky one. The understanding of > terminology in Russian Psychology as "communication", "social interaction" > and "Obchenie" is far from being straightforward. > > I've tried to investigate the problem of communication (obchenie) in > Vygotsky's, Leontiev's and so-called neo-Vygotskian research (see below > Rodina (2006)) . > > The problem of communication as a social relation (rus. obchenie, German > "Verkehr") is highlighted in the works of A.N. Leontiev, Zaporozhets and > M. Lisina, i.e. the concept of early ontogeny of communication (obchenie) > as a communicative activity (not speech activity as an object of study as > in psycholinguistics). Lisina's theory of early emotional > communication/obchenia as a Leading Acitivity has much in common with > Trevarthen's concept of early inter-subjective communication and > socio-emotional development in early ontogeny. Bodrova & Leong (1996: 51) > could also be mentioned as a contemporary variant of Elkonin's and > Lisina's psychological concept of early emotional communication/obchenia > with Tronick`s (1989) "interactional synchrony". > > Lisina's understanding of communication/obchenia as a psychological > category was based on Vygotsky's cultural-historical theory of development > of HMF and Leontiev's activity theory (see for example Lisina, M. (1985) > Child-Adults-Peers: Patterns of Communication. Progress Publishers; > Karpov,Y.(2005). The Neo-Vygotskian Approach to Child Development. > Cambridge University Press; Bodrova, E. & Leong, B.(1996). Tools of the > Mind: The Vygotskian Approach to Early Childhood Education. Prentice-Hall, > Inc., pp. 50-55; Rodina, K. (2006).The Neo-Vygotskian Approach to Early > Communication: A Cultural-Historical and Activity based Concept of > Ontogeny. Nordic Psychology,Vol.58, No.4, 331-354). > > Katarina > > > On Sat, November 21, 2009 17:22, mike cole wrote: > > " Since communication is the precise measure of the possibility of > social > > organization, of good understanding among men (sic), relations that are > beyond its range are not truly social.. > > GH Cooley, 1894. > > > > for Cooley, like Pierce, "mind is made concrete in culture." > > > > --------------- > > Cooley's first book: The theory of transportation. No accident that. > > > > mike > > _______________________________________________ > > xmca mailing list > > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca > > > > > -- > Katarina A. Rodina > Research Fellow (PhD)/Logoped,MNLL > Department of Special Needs Education, > University of Oslo, P.O.Box 1140 Blindern, > NO-0318 Oslo, Norway > Phone: +47 41 108 408/Fax: +47 22 85 80 21 > E-mail: katarina.rodina@isp.uio.no > http://staffdirectory.uv.uio.no/singleview/v1/index.php?user=katja > http://katarinarodina.blogspot.com/ > > Head of Russo-Norwegian Academic Relations, > The Vygotsky Institute of Psychology/RSUH > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca