These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Is "development" a matter of formation, or of production? I will leave that to those whose concern is with "development." (BTW, I think the answer here may differ from how my US colleagues in Dev Psych tend to think about it.)
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org wrote:
Interesting shrapnel of the original thread! During the practice there is indeed the "truth" of the activity, there is no disputing this. But measuring the "truth" is a different matter. In my mind what is the point of talking about social activity leading development if there aren't measurements? I believe the answer to this goes back to LSV's "concept" that instruction/teaching & appropriation/learning have two different measures. what do others think? eric
_______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca