These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] Classical German Philosophy



In fairness I should add that I think Andy is absolutely correct to draw a distinction between two very different ontologies (or approaches to ontological issues). I just don't agree with where he draws the line between the two. I am taking the liberty of attaching two chapters that deal with exactly this issue (plus the introduction) from a book currently in press, to take a shot at explaining how I see the distinction, and its importance.

Martin

Attachment: Packer ch7 & 8.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:37 AM, Martin Packer wrote:

> Andy,
> 
> I'm sorry, but you are misreading phenomenology. Husserl and Heidegger had completely different ontologies, as I have tried to explain here more than once. To claim that your reading is a 'fact' is going to mislead people.
> 
> Martin
> 
> On Mar 11, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Andy Blunden wrote:
> 
>> : be aware of the fact that for everyone from
>> Aristotle to Hegel to Marx to Vygotsky, "Being" and
>> "ontological" meant one thing (or at least one related set
>> of concepts) and from Husserl to Heidegger to Sartre and so
>> on, it meant the exact opposite. Both sets of concepts are
>> fine, but they have very different referents.
>> 
>> ---------------------------
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca

_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca