These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
- Steve On Mar 14, 2010, at 10:20 AM, Martin Packer wrote:
On Mar 14, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Larry Purss wrote:...and I am pretty sure I stole, I mean appropriated, this from someone; I've forgotten who...What do others think of the double helix (and/or the other visual images in the article). How central is the double helix (either as an "is Like" or "IS" objectification) to your notions of the human sciences?Larry<PastedGraphic-2.pdf> _______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca