These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
....didn't realize equating Piaget with intersubjectivity would create a conflaguration of misunderstanding. Am I incorrect in my understanding of intersubjectivity? I believe it to be based on innate abilities rather than appropriated skills. Perhaps Bahktin did not write on this, I must admit I am shallow in my understanding of Bahktin. Initially in my study of LSV and the CHAT tradition I was a person who prioritized innate abilities but as I have studied and practiced teaching I have come to realize that being human IS developed via interactions and attachments. Biological genetics must play into it but I have a hard time believing that intersubjectivity is biological in nature. Am I talking in circles or drowing in misunderstanding? eric _______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca