These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Luria did not write using those terms, Ulvi. You might find interesting Luria's book, *Language and Cognition*, where, among other things, he writes about the idea that humans inhabit two worlds at the same time, or *Nature of Human Conflicts* in which you find his take on intersubjectivity in the context of a discussion of the conditions under which you can know pretty much exactly what another person is thinking about. mike On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:30 PM, ulvi icil <ulvi.icil@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear friends, > > I am in search of a representative article for Vygotskian / Lurain approach > to knowledge of self if any for a comparison of how distanced it is to > Neisser's approach... > Thanks in advance > Ulvi > _______________________________________________ > xmca mailing list > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca > _______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca