These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] Generalization Is Not Abstraction Again



Ok, so I am out of date on the cover debate! I can handle Heidegger, but the New Yorker leaves me baffled!

;)

Martin


On Jul 5, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Martin Packer wrote:

> Plus, are we looking at the same cover? Pelican and sea turtle? I see needle and thread and lock and key.
> 
> Just wondering
> 
> Martin
> 
> On Jul 5, 2010, at 4:14 PM, David Kellogg wrote:
> 
>> When we try to take in the New Yorker cover as a single system, at a single glance, we simply see a rhombus shape, like a map of India, with Jammu and Kashmir at the top where the pelican is and the sea turtle at the bottom in the position of Sri Lanka, 
> <New Yorker cover.tiff>_______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca

_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca