These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] ideology: easy access web page



007 ain't got nuthin' on the cole <------->john-steiner overt/covert 
continuum timescale

;-.>

eric



From:   mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com>
To:     Vera John-Steiner <vygotsky@unm.edu>, "eXtended Mind, Culture, 
Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Date:   09/29/2010 02:19 PM
Subject:        Re: [xmca] ideology: easy access web page
Sent by:        xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu



To me representation corresponds to doodling! (overt and covert!!)
:-)

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Vera John-Steiner 
<vygotsky@unm.edu>wrote:

> Hi,
> To me representation corresponds to brain activity, which is essential 
to
> both overt and covert processes human engage in.
> Vera
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Blunden" <ablunden@mira.net>
> Cc: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 7:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [xmca] ideology: easy access web page>
>
>  Well these pragraphs are interesting, but my only problem for having a
>> CHAT concept of ideology is that the writer takes *representation *as 
the
>> most fundamental category, and defines other concepts in terms of
>> representation. But in CHAT, representation is not the fundamental 
category,
>> which would rather be *activity*. And it is hardly a big struggle to 
define
>> *institutions *in terms of activity. The problem is more how to 
conceive of
>> representation in terms of activity. And I think there are very good 
reasons
>> to have activity as a fundamental category and representation as a
>> derivative concept.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> Larry Purss wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andy & others
>>>
>>> You mentioned that ideology is institutionalized consciousness, or 
that
>>> institutionalization is inherently an aspect of consciousness and each
>>> are
>>> inseparable from one another.
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if this framing of ideology can be linked to notions of
>>> "social representations"  Mike recommended the book "knowledge in 
Context
>>> by
>>> Sandra Jovchelovich and her definition of SOCIAL representations [in
>>> contrast to cognitive notions of representation] seems to parallel the
>>> discussion of ideology.
>>> Her definition of representation:
>>>
>>> To represent is to make present what is actually absent, through the 
use
>>> of
>>> symbols... Representation is at the basis of the construction of
>>> languages,
>>> and the acquisition of speech, and is crucial to establishing the
>>> interrelations that constitute the social order and is the material
>>> through
>>> which cultures form and are transformed across time [history] and 
space."
>>>
>>> She further writes
>>> Representation is the basis of inclusion and exclusion - who is and 
who
>>> is
>>> not represented and underlies the very core of the knowledge of 
ourselves
>>> and the world. Very few representations reach verity [a true depiction 
of
>>> the world]. Even when there is a high level of consensus within he
>>> culture,
>>> there is always some dissent from others proposing alternative
>>> representations.  What constitutes truth and reality is informed by
>>> representations which are always precarious and unstable.... Much of 
the
>>> tension and disputes over representations can be explained by an
>>> underlying
>>> tendency to focus solely on its epistemic function [the ability of
>>> representation to produce knowledge ABOUT the world]  There is a 
strong
>>> tendency to equate the epistemic function of representation with
>>> cognition
>>> and to ERASE from the representational process its connection with
>>> persons
>>> and contexts.  When this happens, representation is reduced to a 
mental
>>> epistemic phenomenon, ruled by information processing functions
>>> [mechanisms]
>>> that cognitive models call "mind".... The MULTIDIMENSIONAL aspects of
>>> representation, which are clearly visible in its social psychological
>>> GENESIS and social foundations are RENDERED INVISIBLE.
>>>
>>> Ideology and "social representations" as concepts seem to share 
similar
>>> roots.
>>>
>>> Larry
>>>
>>> It was good to see that a German speaker read this passage the same 
way I
>>> have, because there are multiple translations of the passage. But if 
we
>>> take
>>> the line that ideology is institutionalised consciousness, or that
>>> institutionalisation is inherently an aspect of consciousness and each
>>> are
>>> inseparable from one another in general, then this problematic concept 
of
>>> "false consciousness" disappears. It is simply a matter of the 
practical
>>> critique of forms of social practice, of what deserves to be defended 
and
>>> what should be brought down.
>>> Andy <Andy@mira.net>
>>>
>>> mike cole wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>   Once Lucas set me off looking at that interesting webpage of Teun 
van
>>>>
>>>>  Dijk,
>>>>> I realized that an inquiry
>>>>> into people's uses of the term, ideology, could take us ANYWHERE. 
So,
>>>>> thinking of anywhere, I thought in
>>>>> particular of Raymond Williams' KEYWORD which is on my home 
bookshelf,
>>>>> and
>>>>> sure enough, the entry there
>>>>> on ideology was interesting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then I wondered if there was a web version so I could add that to 
the
>>>>> discussion in an easy-to-access way and,
>>>>> voila, as they say, I came up with the following;
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.autodidactproject.org/other/ideo8.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> mike
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> xmca mailing list
>>>>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>>>>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> *Andy Blunden*
>>>> Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/ <http://home.mira.net/%7Eandy/
>
>>>> Videos: http://vimeo.com/user3478333/videos
>>>> Book: http://www.brill.nl/scss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> xmca mailing list
>>>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>>>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *Andy Blunden*
>> Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/ <http://home.mira.net/%7Eandy/>
>> Videos: http://vimeo.com/user3478333/videos
>> Book: http://www.brill.nl/scss
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca

_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca