These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Which would be to say, wouldn't it?, that subject and object become differentiated in deliberation and circumspection, from the unity of smoothly flowing practical activity. From a first-person viewpoint, that is. Analytically, we are all aspects of a whole system, folding and unfolding over time. Martin On Oct 17, 2010, at 12:04 PM, mike cole wrote: > Isn't at the point where, phenomenologically and probably physiologically, > there is a discoordination (difference) in action that is of sufficient > magnitude to disrupt the ongoing actions of ego to require > a re-mediation of functional systems of the brain (which are themselves > completed through the environment)? So long as there is perfect > coordination, there is transparency, "lack of consciousness" of a self/other > gap which recruits energy to "minding the gap". _______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca