These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] Tom Toolery



Well, David, hybridity is one of those words that gets extended
promiscuously.. one among many!
mike

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote:

> What would be an example of something which is ideal but not also material,
> David?
> andy
> David Kellogg wrote: ...
>
>> It seems to me that if we follow Steve and Ilyenkov, and we see problem
>> after problem as a matter of establishing the interaction of "ideal" and
>> "material", we will need some kind of super-category for the indivisible
>> whole which both ideal and material make up. Otherwise we really do fall
>> into the worst kind of Cartesian dualism. ...
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________
>
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca