These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] Hallucinating Romantic Science



On 4 January 2013 01:53, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:

> This has been floating around my classes, sorry about the confusion. I
> think its relevant.
> mike
>

Yes and so lovely too.  Almost unamerican if you don't mind my saying: sell
it to McDonald's as a burger wrapping and fund a new college?

Actually, it was from other nearby (to you) American roots where I came
across this in systematic detail: C. Alexander's QWAN.


>
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Greg Thompson <greg.a.thompson@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > yes, mike, if easily accessible, please repost.
> > I only know Leguin from her book "That's Funny, You don't look Buddhist"
> > Would love to read more.
> > -greg
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:25 PM, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Could we call this ambivalence/contradictionS a necessary property of
> >> joint
> >> cultural/mediated activity perhaps. Resistance to too much subordination
> >> is
> >> the otherface of having no categories at all. I have sent Ursula
> Leguin's
> >> short story She Unnames Them to you-all didn't I? If not, shame on me
> and
> >> I
> >> will repost. It is all about classification/naming and resistence.
> >> Something about power and gender in their too, although my students had
> a
> >> hard time believing me when I said that.
> >> mike
> >>
> >>  Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Larry Purss <lpscholar2@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Greg, your additional commentary on the resistance to being
> classified,
> >> but
> >> > at the same time wanting to honour and acknowledge our ancestors, is
> >> > another one of those contradictions [ambivalences??] which I find
> >> > fascinating.
> >> >
> >> __________________________________________
> >> _____
> >> xmca mailing list
> >> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> >> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Gregory A. Thompson, Ph.D.
> > Visiting Assistant Professor
> > Department of Anthropology
> > 883 Spencer W. Kimball Tower
> > Brigham Young University
> > Provo, UT 84602
> > http://byu.academia.edu/GregoryThompson
> >
>
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca