These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] Vygotsky and Dilthey?: Why V was critical towards D?

Yes, I suspect this is what happened. You might want to take a look in Crisis to see if there's textual evidence there.

Martin

On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Greg Thompson <greg.a.thompson@gmail.com> wrote:

> If, as Anton posits, perezhivanie is a direct translation of erlebnis, then
> did Vygotsky just "poach" this from Dilthey's oeuvre while rejecting
> Dilthey's main tenets?


__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca