These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
Glad that old review still held some value. I am not sure how many Russians are directly knowledgeable about these ideas, but would be interested to hear about it. mike On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote: > An excellent review, Mike. > I think that your initial characterisation of Luria's aims: > > "Luria's new science of psychology would encompass the > complex, idiosyncratic, emotion-laden features of people > as described by the great novelists and philosophers of > the 19th century, and yet permit rigorous specification > of elementary pshyciological processes, linked to human > physical nature, which would explain the phenomena we > all recognise as Human Nature." > > can function as a definition of Cultural Psychology. It could be seen as a > resolution of the argument between Dilthey (who rejected the use of natural > scientific methods altogether) and Wundt (who wanted two streams of > psychology side by side, and used subjective methods for laboratory > studies). > > Reading your review, I can also see why you questioned my insistence (in > connection with the discussion of Engestrom's work, here on xmca) on the > distinction between "unit of analysis" and "model system," an example of > which you see as realised in Luria's "combined motor method." > > Andy > > mike cole wrote: > >> Here is a review I wrote some years ago about Luria's Nature of Human >> Conflicts. It summarizes and provides illustrations of some of the issues >> we have been discussing while introducing others. >> Note that a few years ago, the book did appear in Russian based on >> reconstruction of the original >> manuscript by Victor Belopolsky. It is my impression that the book is >> little known or appreciated in Russia but I might be mistaken. >> For what its worth >> mike >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:28 PM, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi BJ-- I will get the article reviewing luria referred to in earlier >>> message next. >>> >>> There is an attachment here. Call it, Cole Review of Nature of Human >>> Conflicts and put it under the Nature of Human Conflicts on the Luria >>> Pubs >>> page and on the page "about" luria. >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Brittany Loy <brittanyloy0217@pointloma.edu**> >>> Date: Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:02 AM >>> Subject: Luria - New Vodka Old Bottle PDF >>> To: Mike Cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> attached >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >>> ------------ >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > -- > ------------------------------**------------------------------** > ------------ > *Andy Blunden* > Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/ > Book: http://www.brill.nl/concepts > http://marxists.academia.edu/**AndyBlunden<http://marxists.academia.edu/AndyBlunden> > > >