These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xmca-l] Re: Shklovsky



I would say that yes, both say both.

Martin

On Aug 21, 2013, at 12:14 PM, Greg Thompson <greg.a.thompson@gmail.com> wrote:

> how to think of essence of the human subject as
> being in reflection or as being in absorption. (and maybe Heidegger answers
> with both. Vygotsky too?).