These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
On 20 October 2013 22:50, Huw Lloyd <huw.softdesigns@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 20 October 2013 19:29, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Very Brave of you to respond to Sukanta, Huw. >> Very daunting question, Sukanta. >> > > It beats the alternative. In developmental psychology we trust. > > H. > > http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/10/16/ghost-cloud-russian-missile-test_n_4106769.html > >> There is a special issue of the journal, Mind, Culture, and Activity >> theory >> a couple >> of years ago that is devoted to the study of Kurt Lewin's action theory >> and >> the >> socio-cultural-historical school. This is a contemporary topic of concern. >> >> Do you have access to the journal? >> mike >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Huw Lloyd <huw.softdesigns@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> >> > Activity theory implicates a holistic developmental paradigm frequently >> > focused upon the social genesis of mind. Cognitive psychology is an >> > umbrella term that typically implicates a much weaker "present >> competence" >> > paradigm and simpler set of practices, principally attending to >> > individual's "processing" in relation to objects of interest, that are >> > typically ignorant of the profound issues addressed in activity theory. >> > However, if you wanted to you could situate activity theory within >> > cognitive psychology as it is concerned with the genesis of >> > cognition<http://www.marxists.org/archive/luria/works/1976/problem.htm >> > >(which >> > cognitive psychology typically is not). >> > >> > If you do the reading I think you'll find that there are no "basic >> > differences" that would be worth bothering with. You are better off >> asking >> > "What are the assumptions of these theories and what do they set out to >> > do." >> > >> > Huw >> > >> > >> > >> > On 13 October 2013 07:21, Sukanta Majumdar <sukantamajumdar@aim.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hello >> > > Will anybody in this group kindly tell me what is the basic difference >> > > among Activity theory, Cognitive Psychology and K.L. Lewin's Field >> > Theory? >> > > I am not from Psychology background, but interested to learn about >> these >> > > for human activity purposes. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Sukanta Majumdar, PhD >> > > Assistant Professor >> > > School of Planning and Architecture, Bhopal >> > > Transit Campus: >> > > MANIT campus, Sports Complex, >> > > Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India 462051. >> > > sukantamajumdar@aim.com >> > > sukanta@spabhopal.ac.in >> > > www.spabhopal.ac.in >> > > Mo. No: +91-9479910018. >> > > Ph. No: +91-755-2670910-ext 238. >> > > Fax No: +91-755-2670908. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > Status: O